Social media age verification laws by country

Multiple countries have passed laws to require age verification for social media services as an attempt to address certain harms on social media. The passage of such laws began primarily after Australia's social media ban for under-16-year-olds was passed in November 2024, and came into force on 10 December 2025. The ban began in the United States at the state level after Utah passed the Utah Social Media Regulation Act in March 2023.[1][2][3][4] These bills and laws vary a lot with some of them restricting access only to certain features or distinguish between different users online and which could lead to companies requiring age verification to have such restrictions such as the Kids Online Safety Act or require it outright and ban users under a certain age such as the Online Safety Amendment in Australia which bans anyone under 16 from holding a social media account including YouTube.[5][6]

Africa

Kenya

In May 2025, the Communication Authority of Kenya published guidelines on online safety for children. One of the requirements for these guidelines was to require Application Service Providers (ASP) and Content Service Providers (CSP) to have age verification to restrict harmful content. Alongside this, the Kenya Parliament introduced the Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Bill, 2025 which requires age verification for social media services such as Facebook and WhatsApp. However, as of August 2025 the bill proposed by the Parliament hasn't passed and the status of the guidelines by the Communications Authority remain unclear.[7][8]

Mauritius

The Information and Communication Technologies Authority published a directive for the deployment of child online protection measures.[9]

Asia

India

In 2025, the ZEP Foundation petitioned the Supreme Court of India for social media regulation. The court denied the request to ban children under 13 from social media saying it was something for the parliament to do and not the courts, however granted the foundations request to propose to the Central Government to require age verification for social media and prohibit usage for those under 16 or 18 years old and set an 8-week deadline, however as of September 2025 no laws have passed that resemble what the petition requested in India.[10][11][12]

Indonesia

Since January 2025, the Indonesian Government has been looking into the idea of setting a minimum age to use social media as well as other protections that would be similar to Australia's, however, hasn't set a minimum age yet for social media and this proposal has been supported by the public been meant with caution.[13][14][15]

Malaysia

In November 2025, the Malaysian Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil announced that starting 1 January 2026, all social media platforms would have to ban all users under 16 years of age and implement age verification via eKYC, saying this was in line with the country's Online Safety Act which was enacted in 2025 and takes effect the same day the ban does.[16][17][18]

Pakistan

In July 2025, a bill was introduced in the Pakistan Senate that would ban social media for minors under 16 and that platforms must implement age verification that are affected by the bill, however unlike other bills that have been either introduced or passed in countries like Australia were the penalties only apply to platforms. The Pakistan version of the under 16 ban also imprisons anyone who makes a social media account for a minor for up to 6 months. The bill however was later withdrawn in August 2025 after controversy; however, the Pakistani Government is still looking to implement a lower age limit of 13 or 14 for social media access and removing the 6 months imprisonment penalty.[19][20][21][22]

Philippines

In July 2025, a bill was introduced in the Senate of the Philippines that would ban social media for minors under 18 by Ping Lacson. Minors with verified parents or guardian consent, limited from 13 to 17 years old by Erwin Tulfo, and the platforms must implement age verification that affects by the bill.[23][24]

Europe

European Union

On 26 November 2025, the EU Parliament voted on a non-legislative report by a vote of 483-92-86. The report would set a minimum age of 16 for social media, while allowing those aged 13 - 15 with parental consent. The report also bans things such as infinite scrolling, auto-play and would protect minors from commercial exploration. It would also prohibit access to services that don't comply with the law within the EU.[25][26][27]

Denmark

On 7 October 2025, the Danish prime minister announced that the government was looking into banning social media for minors under 15, but have stated that they will likely include an exemption for those aged 13 or 14 with parental consent. The government plans to implement this policy as early as 2026.[28][29][30][31][32] On 7 November 2025, Denmark's government announced an agreement to ban access to social media for anyone under 15 years of age, one of the strongest steps by a European Union government. How the ban would be enforced was not shared, but may rely on Denmark's national electronic ID system.[33]

France

On 29 June 2023, France passed a law which would require parental consent for anyone under 15 to use social media, however the bill passed without a clear effective date, stating that they would apply it as soon as possible. If the bill does go into effect, then companies would be fined up to one percent of their revenue if they do not comply with the law.[34][35][36] Since this law has passed the President of France Emmanuel Macron has said he could look into a complete ban for anyone under 15 to use social media.[37][38]

In January 2026, the French National Assembly approved a government-backed bill banning the use of social media by children under the age of 15. The legislation, supported by President Emmanuel Macron’s administration, was adopted by 116 votes to 23 and aims to protect minors’ mental health by mitigating risks such as online harassment and psychological harm. The law requires social media platforms to implement age-verification mechanisms, while allowing exemptions for educational resources such as online encyclopedias.[39][40][41][42][43] This proposed legislation is championed by President Emmanuel Macron and will be heading to the Senate, where it is widely expected to pass with broad cross-party support.[44]

Norway

In Late 2024, the Norwegian Government announced it was setting a minimum age of 15 for social media and would require age verification to access social networks.[2][45] In June 2025, the Government would introduce the bill to set the age limit for consultation and the deadline for this consultation is 7 October 2025.[46][47]

United Kingdom

The Online Safety Act 2023 requires providers of "user-to-user" services (which includes many popular social media services) prevent access by children of content deemed harmful, including but not limited to pornographic content. To do this, platforms including Reddit[48] and Bluesky[49] have implemented age verification for UK users.

Spain

In February 2026, Spain announced plans to ban access to social media platforms for users under the age of 16. The announcement was made by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who stated that the government intends to require social media companies to implement mandatory age-verification systems. According to Sánchez, the proposed measure aims to protect children and adolescents from potential harms in the digital environment, which he described as a “digital wild west.” The policy forms part of broader efforts to strengthen online safety regulations for minors and increase platform accountability.[50][51][52][53]

North America

United States

Federal level

Since 2022, multiple members of congress have introduced bills that would either require age verification for social media platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, or Instagram, or heavily lean towards it even if it doesn't require it outright.

Kids Online Safety Act

The Kids Online Safety Act, also known as KOSA, is a bill in United States Congress that requires online platforms, not just social media companies, that are likely to be used by children to reduce addiction and online harms to them though a duty of care; however, the bill has been criticized by multiple civil rights groups such the ACLU and EFF for potentially leading to online censorship on services using age verification.[54][55][56][57]

Kids Off Social Media Act

The Kids Off Social Media Act is a bill that was introduced originally in April 2024, but died before advancing. It was later reintroduced in January 2025 and advanced out of committee in February 2025; as of June 2025, the bill has been placed on the general calendar, meaning it can be taken up for a vote at any time. The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account and bans certain algorithmic recommendations for anyone under 17; those opposed to it such as the ACLU and Centers for Democracy and Technology have warned that the bill could lead to social media platforms it affects into doing age verification.[58][59][60][61][62]

Protecting Kids on Social Media Act

In April 2023, the Protecting Kids on Social Media Act was introduced, and it, just like the Kids Off Social Media Act, bans social media services for children under 13, and also bans algorithmic recommendations, but instead of banning them for those under 17, it bans it for all minors under 18 and requires parental consent to use social media if the person creating the account is 13–17 years old. The bill was opposed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation because the age verification part of bill would invade privacy rights and would make it easier for the government to identify people and that the parental consent provision could be problematic for older minors; the bill has since died and hasn't been reintroduced.[63][64][65]

State level

Since 2022, multiple states have passed laws requiring age verification for social media services such as California, Utah and Florida; however, very few have taken effect due to legal challenges against them. The only three exceptions to this are Tennessee, Mississippi and Florida.[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] The law in Tennessee took effect after a Federal Judge denied a request to block the law in June 2025, and Mississippi's law HB 1126 was originally blocked from taking effect; however, in July 2025, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the order blocking the law; this then led to the ones challenging the law NetChoice to ask the U.S Supreme Court to block the law again which it denied in August of 2025. What has resulted from this is that Nextdoor has banned anyone under 18 from making an account on their service in Tennessee, and Bluesky has blocked Mississippi users entirely.[75][76][77][78][79] So far over 14 states have passed laws like this and over 32 have introduced them, the only states that haven't introduced nor passed one are North Dakota, and Delaware. So far five states have rejected bills that propose age verification for social media them being Colorado, Montana, Maine, Wyoming and New Hampshire.

Social media age verification by state
State Authority Signed Effective Notes
California Gavin Newsom September 15, 2022 (AB 2273) September 20, 2024 (SB 976) March 2026 (AB 1043) Both partly enjoined On September 15, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 2273 into law, which requires websites which make over $25 million a year or have over 100,000 users and which are likely to be used by children to file Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIAs) to determine how safe their services are and require age estimation for all visitors.

The law was later blocked by Federal Judge Beth Labson Freemen in September 2023 for violating the First Amendment.[80][72] California appealed, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling on the DPIA section of the law and vacated the rest and returned to the Trial Court in August 2024.[81] Judge Freemen blocked the law again completely in March 2025.[82] California would appeal again and the Ninth Circuit would affirm most of the injunction except the provisions about age estimation.[83]

On September 20, 2024, Governor Newsom signed another law SB 976, which requires online services to not give anyone under 18 an addictive feed for more than an hour per day without parental consent and blocks notification between 12 am and 6 am and during school days between 8 am to 3 pm; those under 18 must also have default settings and social media companies must put out some disclosures.[84]

In December 2024, Federal Judge Edward Davila blocked the law's notifications provisions as well as the disclosures provisions, however, let the rest of the law take effect including the age verification provision.[85] NetChoice, the ones challenging the law, asked the court to block it completely pending appeal.

Judge Davila granted this request for 30 days, so that the Ninth Circuit could review the law pending appeal; the Ninth Circuit would later extend the injunction.[86][87]

There was a hearing on the law on April 2, 2025, and a decision remains pending from the Appellate court.[88] On September 9, 2025, the three judge panel of the Appellate court ruled unanimously that NetChoice didn't have standing to assert the rights of its users and that they didn't have standing to challenge the provisions for addictive personalized feeds, and that the private mode for minors which allows only people the minor knows to view their post was constitutional, however ruled that not showing likes to minors without parental consent was unconstitutional.[89]

Utah Spencer Cox March 23, 2023 Preliminarily enjoined On March 23, 2023, Governor Spencer Cox signed the Utah Social Media Regulation Act also known as SB 152 and HB 311. SB 152 requires social media companies with more than 5 million users to conduct age verification on all users and require parental consent for those under 18 years of age and cannot allow a minor on a social media platform between 10:30 pm – 6:30 pm MST.[90][91] HB 311 allows parents of minors who have been harmed by addiction from social media to sue and collect up to 250,000 dollars in damages with a rebuttable presumption that if the minor was under 16 that harm occurred was because of social media. In December 2023 the social media trade association NetChoice sued Utah over the law claiming that it violated the First Amendment.[92]

In response to this Utah amended its social media laws with SB 194 and HB 494 to avoid the law being deemed unconstitutional the governor signed these amendments in March 2024. The new laws removed the curfew of social media of 10:30 pm – 6:30 am and removed the provisions of it that required parental consent to open a social media account. However, youth accounts are still restricted from accessing certain features such as autoplay or direct messaging.[93] However, this wouldn't avoid the constitutional issues as the laws were declared unconstitutional by Chief Judge Robert Shelby on September 10, 2024, by granting NetChoice's request for a Preliminary Injunction basically blocking the laws enforcement pending any further legal proceedings against the law.[94] On November 20, 2025, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals heard an appeal on the law before Chief Judge Jerome Holmes, and Judges Paul Joseph Kelly Jr. and Nancy Moritz.[95]

Arkansas Sarah Huckabee Sanders April 11, 2023 Permanently enjoined In April 2023, Arkansas passed SB 396 which requires certain social such as Facebook and Twitter media platforms to verify the age of users and require parental consent for those under 18. The law would have included websites such as YouTube, which later became exempt after lobbying.[96][97] The law was blocked on August 31, 2023, by Judge Timothy L. Brooks. and would permanently block the law in March 2025.[98][99]
Texas Greg Abbott June 13, 2023 Partly enjoined On June 13, 2023, Texas passed the SCOPE Act also known as HB 18 into law and was set to take effect in September 2024.[100] The law requires websites to verify the parent or guardian of a minor under 18 if they want to join an online service that is covered by the SCOPE Act and those covered websites must also have some level of parental controls over the minors account and websites must filter out a vague list of harmful subjects for minors as well as block targeted advertisements for minors.[101] However, multiple sections of the law were blocked by Judge Robert Pitman of the U.S District Court for the Western District of Texas. The first sections he blocked was in the case Computer & Communications Industry Association v. Paxton where he blocked the filters section of bill on August 30, 2024.[102] He would then later block the targeted advertisements and age verification sections of the law on February 7, 2025, in the case Students Engaged in Advancing Texas v. Paxton.[103] Both the CCIA and SEAT cases are now pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Louisiana John Bel Edwards June 28, 2023 Permanently enjoined On June 28, 2023, SB 162 was passed into law in the state of Louisiana which requires social media platforms to verify age of all users and require parental consent for those under 16 years of age.[104][105][106] Once parental consent is granted the parent or guardian is able to supervise the minors account such being able to view the privacy settings or set breaks on the account.[107] The laws effective date was originally July 1, 2024, but was delayed to July 1, 2025, after Louisiana passed a law banning targeted advertisements for those under 18 which would also take effect on July 1, 2025.[108]

In March 2025 NetChoice sued over both SB 162 and HB 577 during the proceedings of the lawsuit Netchoice was temporally in controversy because the Attorney General of Louisiana Liz Murrill claimed that Netchoice's expert Dr. Anthony Bean had submitted an ai generated declaration in the case and sought to remove his declaration.[109][110] Netchoice has since said that this was the first time they used Dr. Bean for any of their cases but are confident they will win their case still.[111]

On December 15, 2025, the laws of SB 162 and HB 577 were ruled unconstitutional as a violation of the First Amendment and were permanently enjoined.[112][113][114][115]

Ohio Mike DeWine July 4, 2023 Permanently enjoined In July 2023, Governor Mike DeWine signed HB 33 which was the states 2024 - 2025 fiscal bill which included the Social Media Parental Notification Act.[116] The act was put in fiscal bill by former Lieutenant Governor of Ohio Jon Husted as a way to address potential harms on social media services.[117] The law which is codified as 1349.09 and it requires operators of online services to not allow minors under 16 to use their services unless they have parental consent and can revoke parental consent if they choose to.[118]

On April 16, 2025, the law was declared unconstitutional in its entirety and permanently blocked by Judge Algenon L. Marbley after he previously granted a Temporary Restraining Order in January 2024 and a Preliminary Injunction in February of the same year.[119][120][121]

Ohio would appeal the Permeant Injunction and a hearing on the appeal is set for February 4, 2026.[122]

Florida Ron DeSantis March 25, 2024 November 25, 2025 In March 2024, Florida passed HB 3, which is codified as §501.1736 and requires any social media or gaming service that have at least 10 percent of users under 16 who use their service for at least 2 hours a day to ban those under 14 from using their service and require parental consent for those 14 or 15 years old.

On March 13, 2025, Chief Judge Mark E. Walker denied a request to block the law because it was unclear if the law applied to any members of the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) or Netchoice.[123][124][125] He would later in June 2025 grant an amended request to block the law after the Plaintiffs challenging the law submitted evidence that at least some of their members were affected by the act. Florida had also attempted to enforce the law against Snapchat after the Judge denied the first request to block it.[126][127]

The state after the judge granted the request to block the law quickly appealed to the U.S Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.[128]

On November 25, 2025, the U.S Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled 2-1 to grant a stay allowing the law to take effect claiming the law was likely appropriately tailored under intermediate scrutiny the ruling was written by Circuit Judge Elizabeth L. Branch and was joined by Circuit Judge Barbara Lagoa and the dissent from Circuit Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum who wrote that the law likely burdened the First Amendment rights of minors and adults and was likely

unconstitutional.[74] The ones challenging the law the Computer & Communication Industry Association and NetChoice would seek to fast track the appeals process, which was granted, and the case will be heard during the week of February 23, 2026. This was later changed, and is set to be heard in the appellate court on March 10, 2026.[129]

Georgia (U.S. state) Brian Kemp April 23, 2024 Preliminarily enjoined In April 2024, Georgia passed SB 351 codified as §39-6-1 to §39-6-5, which requires social media companies to verify the age of users, and users under 16 must have parental consent and cannot be shown targeted advertising.[130] In June 2025, the law was blocked from taking effect after a federal judge found it to be likely unconstitutional.[131]
Mississippi Tate Reeves April 30, 2024 July 17, 2025 Mississippi in 2024 passed a law known as HB 1126 which requires Digital Service Providers (DSPs) to verify the age of account holders and require parental consent for those under 18. DSPs aren't allowed to collect certain data from users under 18 or show them a vaguely defined list of harmful content such as content about stalking or illegal activities.[132]

In June 2024, the trade association NetChoice sued Mississippi over the law, and in July 2024, federal judge Halil Suleyman Ozerden blocked the law from taking effect.[133][134] Mississippi would then appeal the ruling and in April 2025 the Fifth Circuit would vacate the injunction blocking Mississippi's law because the court didn't review the law correctly under the Supreme Court's decision in Moody v. NetChoice.[135]

NetChoice would then file an amended complaint and won a new injunction in June 2025. Mississippi once again appealed, and in July 2025, the Fifth Circuit stayed the order for the second injunction.[75][76] NetChoice would then appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court which denied the request to block Mississippi's law; however, Justice Kavanaugh concurred stating he believed that NetChoice would succeed on the merits, but didn't show any evidence that a temporary order in favor of the state would harm them.[136][77] In response to this the social networking app Bluesky blocked access to Mississippi in August 2025.[79]

Tennessee Bill Lee May 2, 2024 January 1, 2025 In 2024, Tennesse passed the Protecting Kids from Social Media Act, also known as HB 1891. The law requires social media to verify the age of users and require parental consent for users under 18.[70] On June 18, 2025, Judge Eli Richardson denied a preliminary injunction to block the law because NetChoice had not shown that its members would face irreparable harm without an injunction.[75]

NetChoice would appeal the denial of the injunction to the U.S Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and a hearing on the appeal is on February 4, 2026.[122]

New York Kathy Hochul June 20, 2024 180 days after guidance is given by the Attorney General of New York. In 2024, New York passed a law known as the SAFE For Kids Act that requires parental consent for minors under 18 to use certain social media feeds and restrict notifications between the hours of 12:00 am – 6:00 am.[137][138]
Virginia Glenn Youngkin May 2, 2025 Preliminary enjoined SB 854 codified as §59.1-577.1 is an amendment to the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act, and the amendment to it requires social media companies to estimate the age of users and limit usage to one hour per day per app for users under 16, and the time limit can be increased with parental consent.[139][140]

On November 17, 2025, NetChoice filed a lawsuit in the U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia arguing that the law violates the first amendment of the U.S Constitution and asked the court to enjoin the law before it takes effect in January 2026.[141][142]

On February 27, 2026, Federal Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles ruled that the law served a compelling interest in trying to prevent social media addiction, however it wasn't the least restrictive means of doing so and violated the first amendment rights of both minors and adults by being both over and underinclusive as it exempted video games which can also have problematic and addictive usage.[143][144]

Nebraska Jim Pillen May 20, 2025 July 1, 2026 In May 2025, Nebraska passed the Parental Rights in Social Media Act codified as §86-1701 - §86-1705 requires certain social media platforms to verify the age of users and require parental consent for accounts under 18, and parents are able to have some level of control over teen accounts.[145]
Vermont Phil Scott June 12, 2025 January 1, 2027 In June 2025, Vermont passed the Vermont Age-Appropriate Design Code, which requires businesses that operate or have a majority of their revenue from Vermont to verify the age of users and must impose a minimum duty of care by ensuring that a minor's personal data doesn't lead to harm or discrimination and covered operators must set all privacy settings by default. The Attorney General of Vermont is set to set rules for age verification and compliance and enforces the law.[146][147][148]
South Carolina Henry McMaster February 5, 2026 February 5, 2026 On February 5, 2026, South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster signed H3431 also known as the South Carolina Age-Appropriate Design Code. The law requires covered online services to minimalize harms from there services to minor users under 18 as well as provide control over minor user's experiences on the platform. However, among the requirements of the law is section 39-80-70 of it which requires that services must do a public report to the Attorney General of South Carolina one of these requirements in the public report is how the service does age verification or estimate.[149][150]
Indiana Mike Braun March 4, 2026 January 1, 2027 On March 4, 2026, the governor of Indiana Mike Braun signed HB 1408 one of the requirements of the law is that social media platforms that have at least 10 percent of their audience that is younger than 16 spend an average of 2 hours per day and have certain features that Indiana finds addictive to require parental consent for users under 16 and have the ability of parents to have some level of control over the account and disable some addictive features for accounts under 16.[151][152][153]

The law is similar to Florida's social media law with some differences them being that it only applies to platforms that make more than 1 billion dollars and doesn't outright users under a certain age. Indiana previously in the same session had a bill known as Indiana SB 199 which would have banned minor under 14 from covered platforms and its restriction would have applied to those under 18 not under 16 but that section of the bill was removed by the sponsor of the bill Jeff Raatz for unknown reasons. HB 1408 social media provisions were added to the bill by a vote of 93-0 by the Indiana House and a vote of 49-1 by the Indiana Senate.[154][155][156][157][158]

Rejected social media age verification bills in state legislatures

The list below is of bills that propose to require age verification to use social media platforms but were rejected this list include bills that were intentionally rejected either by being vetoed by the governor and that veto not being overturned or voted down in the state's legislature, not bills that died because they expired in the legislative session.

States Bill Rejected by Notes
Colorado HB 25-086 Governor Jared Polis In 2025 HB 25-086 was introduced to the Colorado State Legislature which requires social media platforms to disclose certain information about their polices among these disclosure requirements was that platforms had to show they users who did provide their true age. On April 24, 2025, Governor Jared Polis vetoed the bill calling the bill fatally flawed and that it erodes privacy. The next day the Senate overrode his veto by a vote of 29–6, however the bill died in the Colorado House of Representatives by a vote of 51–13.[159][160][161][162]
Maine LD 844 Maine State Legislature In 2025 LD 844 was introduced in the Maine State Legislature and requires age verification for social media services and would ban all users under 14 and require parental consent for users aged 14 or 15. A violation of the law results in a fine of 10,000 per violation and 25,000 dollars per violation if the company has violated the law more than once. The Maine State Legislature placed an ought not to pass motion on the bill which was accepted effectively meaning the bill couldn't go forward for this term in the Legislature.[163][164]
Montana HB 925 Montana State Legislature During the legislative session for 2025 in Montana HB 925 was introduced. The bill required social media companies to require age assurance that was at least 95% accurate and set default settings on an account assigned to someone under 18 and these default settings couldn't be changed without parental consent. It would also be enforced though Montana Department of Justice under §30-14-103 of Montana Code and violating §30-14-103 of Montana Code can result of fines 10,000 dollars per violation and up to one year in prison.[165][166][167][168]

The bill passed the House committee by a vote of 12-8 and passed the full House by a vote of 54–44. However, was tabled in the Senate committee it was assigned to by a vote of

11–1. The reason for this is unknown, however likely has to do with fact that similar laws in states such as Utah or Ohio have been found Unconstitutional under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.[169]

Wyoming HB 85 Wyoming State Legislature

On January 26, 2024, HB 85 was introduced to the Wyoming State Legislature by Representative Steve Harshman after he heard of a case from a constituent whose son had passed away after being cyberbullied. The bill would have required social media companies to verified parental consent before a minor under 18 years of age could open an account and this consent could be revoked, the Attorney General of Wyoming would promulgate rules for the act. The law failed for introduction on February 14, 2024, because the vote for it was 36-25 meaning it didn't have enough votes to pass for introduction which requires a vote of two thirds of approval. The bill would be reintroduced in 2025 as HB 19 once again by Steve Harshman, however, wasn't considered and failed a second time. It's unknown if the bill will come back for a third time or another bill similar to it will be introduced for the 2026 session.[170][171][172][173]

New Hampshire HB 1650 New Hampshire House Commerce and Consumer Affairs Committee HB 1650 also known as the New Hampshire Age-Appropriate Design Code was a proposed bill that would have required certain websites to have a duty of care so that websites won't use their data to discriminate or cause emotional harm. Social media platforms also can't have a user under 18 to have their profile be able to be viewed publicly and can't send notification between 12 am to 6 am.[174]

On March 3, 2026, The New Hampshire House Commerce and Consumer Affairs Committee voted 13-0 that the bill was "Inexpedient to Legislate" meaning that the bill won't advance any further.[175]


Canada

Quebec and Nova Scotia

In May 2025, a committee of Quebec Legislative members recommended that social media be banned for those under 14 without parental consent, however, it is unclear if they plan on introduces legislation to implement this policy.[176][177] Liberals in Nova Scotia has also said they plan on introducing a bill to ban anyone under 16 from social media.[178]

South America

Brazil

In September 2025, Brazil passed a law that would require social media companies to implement age verification and link accounts under 16 with their parents and only allow children access to content that is intended for them, the law also requires parental consent to download apps for minors aged between 12 and 18 years old and bans lootboxes in video games similar to Belgium that did by 2018. If platforms don't comply they can be fined up to 50 million reais. The law is expected to take effect in March 2026.[179][180]

Oceania

Australia

In November 2024, Australia's federal parliament passed the Online Safety Amendment, which requires social media companies such as Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok and X (formerly Twitter) to take reasonable steps to prohibit minors under the age of 16 from owning accounts. YouTube was originally excluded, however was later included, and it's also unclear on how age verification will be done under the ban, as a trial for age verification found there were no barriers in implementing age verification. However, the eSafety Commissioner said in the most recent report that age verification isn't required and that the law would take effect in steps. Companies that don't comply can be fined up to $50 million AUD and is enforced by the eSafety Commissioner. The ban came into effect on 10 December 2025.[1][181][182][183]

Papua New Guinea

In October 2025, the government of Papua New Guinea approved its 2025 social media policy which including's a plan to require users in Papua New Guinea to verify their age to prove they are 14 years old or older to access social media platforms such as TikTok or Instagram, the age verification is done via SevisPass digital ID. Platforms must also set up locations in the country and be closely monitored for supposed harmful content. The Government claims the reason for the policy is crackdown on fake news and scams, however the policy has been criticized for potentially limiting free speech.[184][185][186]

New Zealand

In inspiration of Australia's Online Safety Amendment, the Nationals Party of New Zealand along with the Prime Minister of New Zealand Christopher Luxon introduced the Social Media (Age-Restricted Users) Bill in May 2025, which just like its Australian counterpart bans social media accounts for children under 16, however unlike its counterpart its fines aren't so large with the maximum fine that can be imposed being 2 million NZD (1.2 million USD).[187][188][189]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Australia is banning social media for people under 16. Could this work elsewhere — or even there? | The Associated Press
  2. ^ a b Norway to increase minimum age limit on social media to 15 to protect children | Norway | The Guardian
  3. ^ EU plans age checks on social media while France pushes a ban for under-15s | Courthouse News Service
  4. ^ "How does Australia's under-16 social media ban work?". BBC News. 2025-11-20. Retrieved 2026-01-01.
  5. ^ The Kids Online Safety Act is Still A Huge Danger to Our Rights Online | Electronic Frontier Foundation
  6. ^ YouTube to be included in Australia’s social media ban for children under 16 | CNN Business
  7. ^ Communications Authority Publishes New Guidelines Requiring Age-Verification Mechanisms on Social Media - Kenyans.co.ke
  8. ^ Social media age verification trends globally as lawmakers on 4 continents push policy | Biometric Update
  9. ^ "Mauritius - Internet Filtering for Child Protection".
  10. ^ Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea to impose ban on social media usage for children below 13 years - CNBC TV18
  11. ^ Age Verification For Social Media: SC takes cognisance of child safety in digital space | ETLegalWorld
  12. ^ Supreme Court says no to plea for barring kids below 13 from using social media - The Economic Times
  13. ^ Indonesia plans minimum age for social media use | Reuters
  14. ^ Social media age restriction policy met with caution - Society - The Jakarta Post
  15. ^ Indonesia planning minimum age limit for social media users, minister says - Society - The Jakarta Post
  16. ^ Fahmi says Malaysia to block under-16s from social media next year with eKYC age checks in place | Malay Mail
  17. ^ Malaysia to implement social media ban for teens under 16 | The Straits Times
  18. ^ Fahmi says Malaysia to block under-16s from social media next year with eKYC age checks in place - Yahoo News
  19. ^ Pakistan Considers Social Media Ban for Under-16 Users| Medianama
  20. ^ Pakistan explores social media ban for users under 16 | Gulf News
  21. ^ Senate introduces bill to ban social media accounts for under-16s - Pakistan - Aaj English TV
  22. ^ Social media age-limit bill withdrawn from Senate after objections | Pakistan Today
  23. ^ Mangaluz, Jean (July 2, 2025). "Skibidi no more? Lacson seeks to bar minors from social media". The Philippine Star. Retrieved 22 January 2026.
  24. ^ Santos, Tina G. (July 17, 2025). "Senate bill filed limiting social media use for minors". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved 22 January 2026.
  25. ^ Children should be at least 16 to access social media, say MEPs | News | European Parliament
  26. ^ European parliament calls for social media ban on under-16s | Internet safety | The Guardian
  27. ^ EU Parliament pushes for age limits on social media to safeguard minors | Reuters
  28. ^ Denmark plans to ban social media for users under 15, as PM says platforms are ‘stealing childhood’ | CNN Business
  29. ^ Denmark to ban social media for under-15s to protect children from 'unleashed monster' - TRT World
  30. ^ Denmark plans social media ban for under-15s as PM warns phones ‘stealing childhood’ | Denmark | The Guardian
  31. ^ Denmark plans to ban under 15-year-olds from social media | BBC News
  32. ^ Denmark becomes latest European country to push social media ban for under-15s | Euronews
  33. ^ Keaten, Jamey (7 November 2025). "Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media for children under 15". APNews.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  34. ^ France requires parental consent for under-15s on social media
  35. ^ France Senate passes legislation requiring age verification for minors on social media - JURIST - News
  36. ^ France approves law requiring parental consent for minors on social media | France24
  37. ^ Macron to push for ban on social media for under-15s after school stabbing | Reuters
  38. ^ Kids off social media, Macron says - POLITICO
  39. ^ "France's National Assembly approves banning under-15s from social media". www.geo.tv. 2026-01-27. Retrieved 2026-01-31.
  40. ^ "French lawmakers approve bill banning social media for children under 15". AP News. 2026-01-27. Retrieved 2026-01-31.
  41. ^ "Will France be next to ban social media for children under 15?". euronews. 2026-01-26. Retrieved 2026-01-31.
  42. ^ Agencies, Al Jazeera Staff,News. "French MPs approve law seeking ban on social media for children below 15". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  43. ^ "French lawmakers approve bill banning social media for children under 15". ABC News. Retrieved 2026-01-31.
  44. ^ "France leads Europe in proposed crackdown on youth social media use". CNA. Retrieved 2026-03-19.
  45. ^ Norway to raise minimum age to be on social media to 15 | The Independent
  46. ^ Regjeringa sender SoMe-lovforslag på høyring – vil ha 15-årsgrense – Siste nytt – NRK
  47. ^ Norway Moves Forward with Age Limit for Social Media - regjeringen.no
  48. ^ Brodkin, Jon (14 July 2025). "Reddit's UK users must now prove they're 18 to view adult content". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 16 July 2025. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  49. ^ Roth, Emma (10 July 2025). "Bluesky is rolling out age verification in the UK". The Verge. Archived from the original on 11 July 2025. Retrieved 11 July 2025.
  50. ^ "Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says". Apa.az. Retrieved 2026-02-05.
  51. ^ bdnews24.com. "Spain to ban social media access for children under 16". Spain to ban social media access for children under 16. Retrieved 2026-02-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  52. ^ "Spain announces plans to ban social media access for under-16s". ABC News. 2026-02-03. Retrieved 2026-02-05.
  53. ^ "Pedro Sánchez announces that Spain will ban access to digital platforms for children under sixteen years old". www.lamoncloa.gob.es. Retrieved 2026-02-05.
  54. ^ Online safety hearing gets skeptical response from kids, advocates - The Washington Post
  55. ^ 119th Congress | S. 1748
  56. ^ ACLU Slams Senate Passage of Kids Online Safety Act, Urges House to Protect Free Speech | American Civil Liberties Union
  57. ^ The U.S. House Version of KOSA: Still a Censorship Bill | Electronic Frontier Foundation
  58. ^ Text - S.278 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Kids Off Social Media Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
  59. ^ Senators revive bill to ban kids under 13 from social media - The Washington Post
  60. ^ Bill banning social media for youngsters advances - POLITICO
  61. ^ Coalition Letter Regarding Kids Off Social Media Act | American Civil Liberties Union
  62. ^ Banning Kids from Social Media Remains a Bad and Unconstitutional Idea - Center for Democracy and Technology
  63. ^ S.1291 - 118th Congress (2023-2024): Protecting Kids on Social Media Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
  64. ^ Kids under 13 would be barred from social media under bipartisan Senate bill : NPR
  65. ^ The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act is A Terrible Alternative to KOSA | Electronic Frontier Foundation
  66. ^ California Governor Signs Sweeping Children’s Online Safety Bill - The New York Times
  67. ^ Newsom Signs Bill That Adds Protections for Children on Social Media - The New York Times
  68. ^ Utah social media law requires parental permission for kids : NPR
  69. ^ Ron DeSantis signs Florida social media ban for children into law | Florida | The Guardian
  70. ^ a b TN Gov. Lee signs 'Protecting Children from Social Media Act' | wbir.com
  71. ^ Federal judge temporarily blocks Utah social media law aimed at protecting children | AP News
  72. ^ a b Court blocks California’s online child safety law | The Verge
  73. ^ Federal judge blocks Florida from enforcing social media ban for kids while lawsuit continues | AP News
  74. ^ a b Florida can enforce law restricting minors' social media access| Tallahassee Democrat
  75. ^ a b c Mississippi Online Age-Verification Law Blocked for Second Time | Bloomberg Law
  76. ^ a b Court rules Mississippi's social media age verification law can go into effect | AP News
  77. ^ a b Supreme Court allows restrictions on children’s access to social media to remain in place - SCOTUSblog
  78. ^ Tennessee Age Restrictions | NextDoor
  79. ^ a b Bluesky Goes Dark in Mississippi Over Age Verification Law | WIRED
  80. ^ Bill Status - AB-2273 The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act.
  81. ^ Federal court upholds block on California child online safety law - The Washington Post
  82. ^ Court blocks California law on children's online safety | Reuters
  83. ^ California law to protect minors online gets another reprieve from Ninth Circuit | Courthouse News Service
  84. ^ Bill Text - SB-976 Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act.
  85. ^ Judge blocks parts of California bid to protect kids from social media | Courthouse News Service
  86. ^ California Kids’ Social Media Addiction Law Blocked by Court (1)| Bloomberg Law
  87. ^ Ninth Circuit blocks California law protecting kids from social media addiction | Courthouse News Service
  88. ^ California pushes Ninth Circuit to lift block on its law protecting children from social media addiction | Courthouse News Service
  89. ^ Ninth Circuit sides with California over regulating minors' 'addictive' social media feeds | Courthouse News Service
  90. ^ Utah Signs Bills Regulating Minors’ Social Media Usage - Lexology
  91. ^ Utah proposes new rules to part of bills in regulating social media companies| KUTV
  92. ^ NetChoice sues Utah over new social media laws passed by the Legislature| The Salt Lake Tribune
  93. ^ Utah governor replaces social media laws for youth as state faces lawsuits | AP News
  94. ^ Utah law restricting youth social media use blocked by judge | Reuters
  95. ^ Report - Calteam 06 Calendar| U.S Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  96. ^ SESSION SNAPSHOT: The 94th Arkansas General Assembly adjourns | Arkansas Advocate
  97. ^ Big Tech carves loopholes out of state kids’ safety laws - POLITICO
  98. ^ Judge blocks law requiring parental consent for kids to use social media - POLITICO
  99. ^ Federal judge declares Arkansas social media age-verification law unconstitutional | Arkansas Advocate
  100. ^ Texas HB 18: Scope Act aims to protect teens from harmful content | khou.com
  101. ^ 88(R) HB 18 - Enrolled version - Bill Text
  102. ^ Judge allows parental consent for Texas kids' social media accounts| CBS Austin
  103. ^ Judge blocks more provisions of Texas social media law | The Texas Tribune
  104. ^ SB162
  105. ^ 51:1751 - Louisiana State Legislature
  106. ^ 51:1752 - Louisiana State Legislature
  107. ^ 51:1754 - Louisiana State Legislature
  108. ^ Louisiana Extends Child Data Protection Law and Restricts Social Media Platform Use of Minors' Data | Practical Law
  109. ^ Internet freedom group sues Louisiana over its social media law for minors | Louisiana | thecentersquare.com
  110. ^ NetChoice Pulls Expert After Allegations of AI Fabrications (1)| Bloomberg Law
  111. ^ Apparent Massive Quotation/Citation Errors in Netchoice Expert's Report - Reason.com
  112. ^ Judge blocks Louisiana's social media age verification law| Engadget
  113. ^ Louisiana’s law requiring social media age verification for minors slapped down in court| WAFB 9
  114. ^ Louisiana Social Media Age Gate Law Hit by Permanent Injunction| Bloomberg Law
  115. ^ Federal judge strikes down Louisiana social media age-check law | New Orleans CityBusiness
  116. ^ House Bill 33 | 135th General Assembly | Ohio Legislature
  117. ^ Ohio could require parental consent for kids to use some social media| The Columbus Dispatch
  118. ^ Section 1349.09 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
  119. ^ Ohio parental consent mandate spiked for kids on social media | Courthouse News Service
  120. ^ Federal judge temporarily halts Ohio's new social media parental consent law| ABC6
  121. ^ A judge has blocked enforcement of an Ohio law limiting kids’ use of social media during litigation | AP News
  122. ^ a b Week of February 2 - 6, 2026 (Updated 2/2/26 at 8:00 a.m.) - 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
  123. ^ Florida governor signs law restricting social media access for children | CNN Business
  124. ^ Chapter 501 Section 1736 - 2024 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate
  125. ^ Judge rejects request to block Florida law aiming to keep children off social media - CBS Miami
  126. ^ Florida Sues Snapchat Over Childhood Addiction - Newsweek
  127. ^ Judge blocks Florida law banning social media accounts for children | Reuters
  128. ^ Florida appeals federal judge's ruling which blocks enforcement of social media ban for kids - CBS Miami
  129. ^ Appeals court fast-tracks challenge to Florida law restricting children's social media access - CBS Miami
  130. ^ Georgia Enacts Law Regulating Social Media Use for Minors | Practical Law
  131. ^ Judge blocks Georgia's social media age verification law after a similar one was blocked in Ohio - CBS Pittsburgh
  132. ^ HB1126 (As Sent to Governor) - 2024 Regular Session
  133. ^ Mississippi is the latest state sued by tech group over age verification on websites | Courthouse News Service
  134. ^ Injunction halts Walker Montgomery Protecting Children Online Act from taking effect - Magnolia Tribune
  135. ^ NetChoice v. Fitch, No. 24-60341 (5th Cir. 2025) :: Justia
  136. ^ Trade group asks Supreme Court to limit Mississippi’s social media law| The Hill
  137. ^ NY State Senate Bill 2023-S7694A(nysenate.gov)
  138. ^ New York governor signs bill regulating social media algorithms, in a US first | CNN Business
  139. ^ Youngkin signs bill to limit social media for kids under 16 | wusa9.com
  140. ^ § 59.1-577.1. (Effective January 1, 2026) Social media platforms; responsibilities and prohibitions related to minors| Code of Virginia
  141. ^ NetChoice sues Virginia to block its one-hour social media limit for kids | The Verge
  142. ^ NetChoice Sues Virginia To Stop Social Media Limits For Kids - Law360
  143. ^ Judge halts Virginia's new social media restrictions for minors| WTVR
  144. ^ Judge Blocks Virginia Law Limiting Kids' Social Media Time | PCMag
  145. ^ Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen signs school cellphone ban, social media age limit into law | Nebraska ABC8 Now
  146. ^ Vermont Enacts Age-Appropriate Design Code | Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  147. ^ Neb., Vt. pass Kids Code bills to regulate online platforms for minors – Pluribus News
  148. ^ Bill Status S.69 (Act 63) | Vermont Legislature
  149. ^ 2025-2026 Bill 3431: South Carolina Social Media Regulation Act - South Carolina General Assembly
  150. ^ Bill to limit screen time for minors heads to S.C. governor’s desk – WSOC TV
  151. ^ HB1408.04.ENRS.pdf| Indiana General Assembly
  152. ^ Indiana youth social media crackdown advances to governor’s desk • Indiana Capital Chronicle
  153. ^ Raatz: Bill to protect kids from harms of social media heads to governor| Indiana Senate Republicans
  154. ^ HB1408.400_H.pdf| Indiana General Assembly
  155. ^ HB1408.311_S.pdf| Indiana General Assembly
  156. ^ Statement from Sen. Jeff Raatz on Senate Bill 199| Indiana Senate Republicans
  157. ^ Indiana House panel advances school cellphone crackdown, revised youth social media bills • Indiana Capital Chronicle
  158. ^ SB0199.01.INTR.pdf| Indiana General Assembly
  159. ^ Protections for Users of Social Media | Colorado General Assembly
  160. ^ Polis vetoes social media bill, setting up potential showdown with legislature | CPR News
  161. ^ Colorado Senate votes to override Polis veto of social media regulation bill | Colorado Newsline
  162. ^ Polis veto of Colorado social media bill stands as House declines to vote on override | Colorado Newsline
  163. ^ Bill Text: ME LD844 | 2025-2026 | 132nd Legislature | Introduced | LegiScan
  164. ^ LD 844 Maine | 2025 - 2026 132nd Legislative Session Maine
  165. ^ Social Media Youth Protection Act heads to House floor | NBC Montana
  166. ^ HB 925 | Montana Legislature
  167. ^ 30-14-142. Penalties, MCA
  168. ^ 30-14-111. Department to restrain unlawful acts, MCA
  169. ^ House Bill 925: Generally revise social media laws for minors | 2025 MTFP Capitol Tracker
  170. ^ 2024 - HB0085| Wyoming Legislature
  171. ^ 2025 - HB0019 | Wyoming Legislature
  172. ^ Casper lawmaker brings back bill requiring parental consent for social media accounts | Local News | wyomingnews.com
  173. ^ Casper lawmaker brings back bill requiring parental consent for social media accounts| Yahoo News
  174. ^ HB 1650 Bill Text - New Hampshire General Court
  175. ^ Docket of HB1650 - New Hampshire General Court
  176. ^ No social media before 14 years old: Quebec's Special Commission on the Impacts of Screens on youth| City News Everywhere
  177. ^ Quebec committee recommends restricting social media accounts for youth | Montreal Gazette
  178. ^ N.S. Liberals to table bill that would ban use of social media by children under 16 | CBC News
  179. ^ Social Media Protections For Minors Expanded As Brazil Lower House Passes Law | NDTV
  180. ^ Brazil passes new law to protect children's online privacy - JURIST - News
  181. ^ Social media ban Australia: Albanese government includes YouTube, exempts YouTube Kids in new age restrictions | The Sydney Morning Hearld
  182. ^ Final rules for social media ban revealed, with no legally enforceable effectiveness standard - ABC News
  183. ^ Trial finds age assurance can be done, as under-16s social media ban deadline looms - ABC News
  184. ^ Papua New Guinea set to enforce social media age restrictions to tackle fake news, online abuse | The Indian Express
  185. ^ Papua New Guinea considers age restrictions on social media amid fears voices will be ‘silenced’ | Papua New Guinea | The Guardian
  186. ^ Papua New Guinea mulls age restrictions on social media | A News
  187. ^ Social media ban for young people to be investigated - Luxon | RNZ News
  188. ^ National MP puts forward member's bill to ban under-16s from social media | RNZ News
  189. ^ New Zealand’s prime minister proposes social media ban for under-16s | New Zealand | The Guardian