Particulate matter sampler
A particulate matter sampler is an instrument for measuring particulates (solids and liquids) suspended in air. Particulate matter (PM) contains a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets. It can include both inorganic materials (e.g. carbon, metals and other chemicals from dust, smoke, soot, sea salt, or sulfates)[1] and organic materials (e.g. bioaerosols from microbial, fungal, animal, or plant sources).[2][3][4]
Air quality is monitored worldwide at regulatory stations. Scientists, doctors, industries, and the public are interested in using low-cost particulate matter sensors to detect air quality locally and in real time.[5] Some particulate matter samplers can continuously measure and report properties of particulates, while others collect samples for later analysis in a laboratory.[6] Different types of PM samplers can measure particulate matter in terms of particle size, particle mass, particle number, particle size distribution, and particle surface area.[7] Inertial separators may be used to eliminate particles outside of the size range that is desired to be measured.[8]
Measurement types
Airborne particulate matter (PM) is a complex mixture that can include small liquid droplets, dry solids, and liquid coatings around solid centers. Particles vary widely in size, shape and chemical composition.[9] Each source has its own particular emission profile or signature in terms of particle size and chemical composition.[5] The distribution of particles of different sizes within an air sample is important to understanding how particles will behave in the atmosphere and in the respiratory system.[10][4]
For air quality regulation, measurements are often defined in terms of the maximum diameter of the particles being measured. Coarse particulates with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM10) are of concern because they can be breathed into the lungs and cause harm. Fine particulate matter is smaller, with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less (PM2.5), and can penetrate farther into the lungs.[9] The term ultrafine (UF) is sometimes used for the smallest particulates, less than 0.1 micrometers.[11] The terms PM10 and PM2.5 define common cutoffs for particle size which are used when taking measurements. The numerical values reported for each category give the amount of particles in the size range being measured.[9] Exposure standards for PM10 and PM 2.5 have been set by various countries.[5] However, medical research suggests that no level of particulate exposure is safe.[1]
Particulate mass concentration (PMC) is a key air quality indicator used to measure pollution levels and assess potential health risks.[11] Particulate mass concentration is the total mass of particles present in a given volume of air. Such measurements typically describe particulate matter in terms of units of mass per volume,[12] e.g. micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3).[13] PMC is generally determined by filtering, sampling, and weighing particles collected from air. Filters may be designed to detect a particular size range (e.g. PM10 or PM2.5) or type of particulate.[9] Measurements can be made using techniques such as gravimetric analysis, beta attenuation monitoring, and tapered element oscillating microbalances.[7] Particulate mass concentration is often used in compliance monitoring for quality assurance, data collection for trend analysis, and high spatial resolution measurements.[7] However, PMC methods may tend to ignore ultrafine particles, because total mass can be dominated by a small number of large particles.[12][5][14]
In number-based measurements, the number of individual particles is counted, independent of their size or mass.[12][14] Particle number concentration can be measured using condensation particle counters,[7] light scattering methods[13] (e.g. optical particle counters[7]), and instruments based on diffusion chargers.[7] Number concentration measurements can reveal important information about specific types of particles and their distribution over time. Number-based measurements may be particularly useful for identifying ultrafine particles. However, care must be taken to ensure that methods chosen are not biased towards detection of larger particles.[12]
Diffusion chargers can be used to measure the active surface area of particles.[15] Particle size distributions can be measured by using cascade impactors (e.g. gravimetric impactors), scanning mobility particle sizers, aerodynamic particle sizers, fast mobility particle sizers,[7] and electrical low pressure impactors.[16]
Instrument types
Particulate mass concentration (PMC)
Gravimetric mass determination
Gravimetric mass determination of particulate mass concentration is a two-stage process of collection and analysis. Sample collection uses standardized equipment to draw a known volume of air through a filter. The filter is weighed on an analytical balance before and after sampling. Collection may occur over a fixed time period such as 24 hours. The filter is brought back to a laboratory for analysis to determine the concentration of particulate material that it contains. The difference in weight divided by the volume of air pulled through the filter gives the mass concentration of the particulate.[17][5]
For gravimetric air quality analysis, water that is combined with a contaminant is considered part of particulate matter. However, the definition of particulate matter does not include uncombined water, such as pure steam or water vapor. Uncombined water in a particulate sample should be removed, either by heating the sample to evaporate the water before the sample is weighed, or by placing the sample in a low humidity environment before weighing.[18]
In the USA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets standards for filter-based Federal Reference Methods (FRM) and continuous Federal Equivalency Methods (FEM) for air monitoring.[19] Gravimetric filter-based PM2.5 FRM measurements are considered the gold standard for accuracy of measurement.[19]
Beta Attenuation Monitor
The method of beta attenuation monitoring was introduced in the 1970s.[20] When beta rays pass through a material, high-speed electrons (beta particles) strike against that material and lose energy. This reduction in intensity, or attenuation, can be measured. The more mass in a material, the more particles it will absorb. Given an air sample containing more particulate matter, more beta particles will lose energy and be absorbed.[21][20]
A beta attenuation monitor (BAM) or beta gauge uses the technique of beta-ray absorption or attenuation to measure the mass of particulate matter. A reel to reel filter tape passes through a beta attenuation cell. Air is pulled through the filter tape for a certain period of time, e.g. 42-50 minutes, to collect an air sample. Beta-rays are directed at the tape before and after the air sample is taken to calculate mass. The before-and-after measurements are compared to determine the amount of particulate matter in the sample.[21][20]
Electronic beta attenuation monitors can be used for measurement of particulate mass in the field.[21][20] Although they can be used to make a series of measurements, such devices are stationary, bulky, and costly.[22] Measurements can be affected by fluctuating environmental factors such as high relative humidity and particle composition. Therefore this method has lower accuracy than the gravimetric method, which measures mass directly.[21][20]
Tapered element oscillating microbalance
Tapered oscillating microbalances were introduced in the 1990s.[20] A tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) can be used for continuous, real-time detection of particulate matter by measuring mass concentration.[5] However, like BAMs, TEOMs are stationary, bulky, and costly.[22]
A TEOM filter cartridge is mounted on the tip of a hollow glass tube, which is free to vibrate as air is drawn through it. An electrical circuit causes the tube to vibrate. As particulate matter from the air collects on this filter, the tube's frequency of oscillation decreases. The resonant frequency of the tube, or rate at which it vibrates, is inversely proportional to the square root of the mass that collects on the filter. The change in frequency is used to calculate the particle mass. A filter dynamic measurement system (FDMS) can be used to ensure that the filter is periodically cycled and reset to its natural frequency. Factors such as mechanical noise and temperature fluctuations can interfere with the sensor's vibrations and affect the accuracy of its results.[5]
Noise based particulate estimation
Urban traffic is a major source of pollution. Microphone based instruments have been used to monitor noise levels and predict traffic-related particle number concentration (PNC) near roadways. Specific frequency bands (e.g., 40 Hz, 500 Hz, 800 Hz) are associated with the operation of different engines and fuels. Computer systems can be trained to identify patterns in noise and predict pollutant concentrations based on training data. Devices such as sound meters and smartphones, which are small and portable, can then be used to predict particulate levels based on the computer's model. Conditions such as wind, humidity, building characteristics, and specific traffic conditions, can influence both the model and predicted results.[23][24]
Particle number concentration
Optical particle counters
Optical particle counters (OPCs) use light scattering to measure particulate matter by shining a beam of light through an air sample. Types of light sources include focused incandescent lamps, lasers and infrared light emitting diodes (IR LEDs).[5][21] OPCs were introduced in the 1940s[25] and became increasingly used following the invention of lasers in the 1960s.[5] Lasers, which have a more intense light than IR LEDs, can be used to classify both the number and size of particles.[5]
Optical particle counters contain a light source, an intake system to draw in air, an area where a light beam is projected through the air sample, and photodetection sensors to measure the scattered light.[25] A light beam is scattered as it hits individual particulates, changing the intensity, angle, and pattern of the light. Scattering can be precisely described according to Mie theory. The rate of detection can be used to count the number of particulates present, while the intensity of the scattered light can indicate particulate size.[5]
Based on a priori assumptions about particle size and distribution, optical particle counters can be used to estimate mass concentration. Particulates can be classified by size, and algorithms can be used to estimate mass based on the numbers of sizes of particulates present. Proper calibration is essential to ensure that the conditions that are assumed actually apply.[5][21] Some optical particle counters can perform real-time particulate matter measurements comparable to the precision and accuracy of an FEM instrument.[5]
Low-cost particulate matter sensors (LCPMS) are miniaturized and simplified OPCs.[25] While LCPMS still use light scattering techniques, they tend to be less accurate.[5] Their advantages are that they are generally cheaper, smaller, portable, and can be used for real-time measurements.[21][5] LCPMS are used in equipment such as air purifiers, IoT devices and handheld air quality monitoring devices. LCPMS generally require calibration and are highly vulnerable to external factors such as temperature and humidity.[21][5]
Condensation particle counters
A condensation particle counter (CPC) or condensation nucleus counter (CNC) is a modified optical particle counter. It extends the range of the OPC, enabling it to detect and count much smaller particles. Ultrafine particles are passed through a vapor so that larger droplets will condense around the small particle. The larger droplets can then be detected. With conventional optical techniques, particles below 50 nm are generally undetectable.[15] Depending on the vapor and condensation technique used, CPCs are able to detect particles as small as 2 nm. The minimum detectable particle size of a CPC is commonly defined as the diameter at which the CPC detects 50% of the particles.[26]
Condensation particle counters are used for the measurement of both laboratory and on-road vehicle emissions.[27][13][28] Limits for vehicle exhaust particle number (PN) concentrations have been set as part of the European Union's standards for light-duty vehicle emissions.[29][28] To measure vehicle PN, condensation particle counters with a counting efficiency (CE) of 50% at 23 nm are required.[30] CPCs are also used in some workplaces to assess occupational safety. Care must be taken to ensure that environmental measurements will not exceed the range of the CPC.[15]
Particle surface monitors
Diffusion chargers
Different types of particulates can have non-spherical shapes and differing surface areas.[15] Studies of particles within the human respiratory tract, from the 1980-90's, have shown that surface area and aerodynamic diameter of particles are related to the probability that a particle will remain within the respiratory system and cause harm.[31]
Diffusion chargers (DCs) are direct-reading instruments that use corona discharge from an electrode to measure the active surface area of particles.[15] Diffusion chargers measure particulate matter (PM) by using an electrical current to generate a corona discharge. A current flows from an electrode with a high potential into a neutral surrounding area, such as air, and generates ions that can diffuse to particles in the airstream. Once free ions are removed from the system, the amount of charge that transferred to the remaining particles is measured. The resulting electrical current correlates with the active surface area of the particles.[15][28] Diffusion chargers can be used alone as particle surface monitors or with other instruments to examine additional particle properties.[32]
Diffusion chargers are especially effective for detecting nanoparticles, typically in the 10–300 nm range, and measuring lung-deposited surface area (LDSA)[33]. DCs can measure higher particle concentrations than CPCs. Diffusion chargers do not use working fluids and can operate at higher temperatures.[28]
Particle separators
Particles of different sizes have different health effects.[4] Particle separators are used to collect particles within a specific size range. This can be particularly useful when examining fine particles and size-specific types of bioaerosols.[8] Particle samplers can use a variety of collection mechanisms including solid plate impaction, centrifugal impaction, filtration, and liquid impingement.[8]
Inertial impactors operate using a technique called solid plate impaction. A stream of air containing particles of different sizes is directed along along a tube towards a greased metal plate. The tube contains a sharp corner that causes the air stream to exit away from the plate. Because of inertia, larger particles will continue moving in a straight line and hit the plate, separating them from the smaller particles which continue through the turn as part of the air stream.[8][4] Horizontal air velocity has a significant effect on separation, as does gravity. An air flow control system may be used to send air through the particle separator at the velocity required to separate particles into desired sizes.[34] Particles can then be collected and removed. Inertial impactors are widely used for bioaerosol sampling.[8]
Cyclone separators use centrifugal impaction, spinning the gas stream to cause collisions of heavier particles around the cyclone wall. Cyclones are often used as pre-samplers to selectively remove large particles. Multiple stages can be linked together to collect different sizes of particles, but this risks transport loss during collection.[8]
Filtration mechanisms collect aerosols based on interception, inertial impaction, diffusion, gravity, and electrostatic attraction. Filtration can be applied and specialized to a broad range of particle sizes, and is often used for bioaerosol sampling of particles smaller than 1 μm. Samplers that use filtration often can be designed in small sizes.[35]
Liquid impingement directly collects aerosols in a collection fluid. It has a high retention efficiency but results can be affected by evaporation of the collection fluid over time. This technique is generally not appropriate for high-volume sampling.[8]
See also
References
- ^ a b c Hamanaka, RB; Mutlu, GM (2 September 2025). "Particulate matter air pollution: effects on the respiratory system". The Journal of clinical investigation. 135 (17). doi:10.1172/JCI194312. PMID 40892514.
- ^ Mack, SM; Madl, AK; Pinkerton, KE (18 December 2019). "Respiratory Health Effects of Exposure to Ambient Particulate Matter and Bioaerosols". Comprehensive Physiology. 10 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1002/cphy.c180040. PMID 31853953.
- ^ Zhou, P; Xu, Y; McElroy, AN; Osborn, MJ; Dababneh, A; Palraj, R; Moschou, D; Pourzand, C; Ellis, DA; Zhang, D; White, IH; Cui, T (2026). "Beyond Diagnosis: Aerosol Viral Monitoring to Transform Epidemic Responses". Research (Washington, D.C.). 9: 1059. doi:10.34133/research.1059. PMID 41509127.
- ^ a b c d e "How Do Particulates Enter the Respiratory System?: OSH Answers". Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety. January 3, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Alfano, B; Barretta, L; Del Giudice, A; De Vito, S; Di Francia, G; Esposito, E; Formisano, F; Massera, E; Miglietta, ML; Polichetti, T (29 November 2020). "A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers' Perspectives". Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 20 (23). doi:10.3390/s20236819. PMID 33260320.
- ^ "What is a Particulate Matter Sampler?". Envirotech Online. International Environmental Technology. Retrieved 8 March 2026.
- ^ a b c d e f g Lowther, SD; Jones, KC; Wang, X; Whyatt, JD; Wild, O; Booker, D (15 October 2019). "Particulate Matter Measurement Indoors: A Review of Metrics, Sensors, Needs, and Applications". Environmental science & technology. 53 (20): 11644–11656. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03425. PMID 31512864.
- ^ a b c d e f g Lim, JH; Nam, SH; Kim, J; Kim, NH; Park, GS; Maeng, JS; Yook, SJ (15 November 2021). "High-volume sampler for size-selective sampling of bioaerosols including viruses". Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994). 265 118720. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118720. PMID 34539212.
- ^ a b c d "Inhalable Particulate Matter and Health (PM2.5 and PM10) | California Air Resources Board". ww2.arb.ca.gov. Retrieved 2026-03-09.
- ^ Finlay, WH; Darquenne, C (August 2020). "Particle Size Distributions". Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery. 33 (4): 178–180. doi:10.1089/jamp.2020.29028.whf. PMID 32598205.
- ^ a b D'Evelyn, SM; Vogel, C; Bein, KJ; Lara, B; Laing, EA; Abarca, RA; Zhang, Q; Li, L; Li, J; Nguyen, TB; Pinkerton, KE (1 January 2021). "Differential inflammatory potential of particulate matter (PM) size fractions from Imperial Valley, CA". Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994). 244. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117992. PMID 33184556.
- ^ a b c d "Number- vs. Mass-Based UFP Monitoring Methods". tsi.com. Retrieved 2026-03-09.
- ^ a b c Wang, J; Liu, X; Wang, C; Qiu, Y; Zhou, J; Dang, Q (18 March 2025). "Research on the Measurement of Particulate Matter Concentration in Diesel Vehicle Exhaust Using the Light Scattering Method". Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 25 (6). doi:10.3390/s25061898. PMID 40293033.
- ^ a b Nazarenko, Yevgen; Pal, Devendra; Dwivedi, Sanjeev; Ariya, Parisa A. (2025-01-01). "Air quality standards and WHO's guidance on particulate matter measuring 2.5 μm (PM2.5)". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 103 (1): 71–72. doi:10.2471/BLT.23.290522. ISSN 1564-0604. PMC 11704637. PMID 39781000.
- ^ a b c d e f Vosburgh, DJH; Cauda, E; O'Shaughnessy, PT; Sheehan, MJ; Park, JH; Anderson, K (December 2022). "Direct-reading instruments for aerosols: A review for occupational health and safety professionals part 1: Instruments and good practices". Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. 19 (12): 696–705. doi:10.1080/15459624.2022.2132255. PMID 36197119.
- ^ Pili, S; Lecca, LI; Pedrazzi, T; Ghitti, R; Murru, A; Uras, M; Fabbri, D; Campagna, M; De Palma, G (15 December 2024). "Exposure assessment to fine and ultrafine particulate matter during welding activity in the maintenance shop of a steelmaking factory". Heliyon. 10 (23) e40815. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40815. PMID 39717610.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ "Air Monitoring Calculators". Perfect Pollucon Services. Retrieved 2016-04-07.
- ^ "What is an Air Contaminant/ Pollutant?" (PDF). Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. 2004. Retrieved 16 March 2026.
- ^ a b Krug, J; Long, R; Colón, M; Habel, A; Urbanski, S; Landis, MS (November 2021). "Evaluation of small form factor, filter-based PM(2.5) samplers for temporary non-regulatory monitoring during wildland fire smoke events". Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994). 265: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118718. PMID 35153533.
- ^ a b c d e f Air Quality Expert Group to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Scottish Government; Welsh Government; and Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs in Northern Ireland (2023). New Opportunities for Particulate Measurements (PDF). Crown copyright.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c d e f g h Cho, H; Baek, Y (14 September 2021). "Practical Particulate Matter Sensing and Accurate Calibration System Using Low-Cost Commercial Sensors". Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 21 (18). doi:10.3390/s21186162. PMID 34577369.
- ^ a b Baker, M; Gollier, F; Melzer, JE; McLeod, E (14 July 2023). "Lensfree Air-Quality Monitoring of Fine and Ultrafine Particulate Matter Using Vapor-Condensed Nanolenses". ACS applied nano materials. 6 (13): 11166–11174. doi:10.1021/acsanm.3c01154. PMID 37744874.
- ^ Fallah-Shorshani, Masoud; Fruin, Scott; Yin, Xiaozhe; McConnell, Rob; Franklin, Meredith (20 September 2024). "Estimating near-roadway air pollution from multi-frequency noise measurements". Science of The Total Environment. 944 173900. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173900. ISSN 0048-9697.
- ^ Khan, J; Ketzel, M; Kakosimos, K; Sørensen, M; Jensen, SS (1 September 2018). "Road traffic air and noise pollution exposure assessment - A review of tools and techniques". The Science of the total environment. 634: 661–676. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.374. PMID 29642048.
- ^ a b c Molaie, S; Lino, P (9 April 2021). "Review of the Newly Developed, Mobile Optical Sensors for Real-Time Measurement of the Atmospheric Particulate Matter Concentration". Micromachines. 12 (4). doi:10.3390/mi12040416. PMID 33918877.
- ^ "Condensation Particle Counter Fundamentals Factors to Consider when Selecting a CPC for your Application" (PDF). TSI Incorporated. January 3, 2024. Retrieved 12 March 2026.
- ^ Campagnolo, Davide; Cattaneo, Andrea; Corbella, Leonardo; Borghi, Francesca; Del Buono, Luca; Rovelli, Sabrina; Spinazzé, Andrea; Cavallo, Domenico M. (1 February 2019). "In-vehicle airborne fine and ultra-fine particulate matter exposure: The impact of leading vehicle emissions". Environment International. 123: 407–416. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.020. ISSN 0160-4120.
- ^ a b c d Melas, Anastasios; Selleri, Tommaso; Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo; Giechaskiel, Barouch (2021-12-13). "Evaluation of Solid Particle Number Sensors for Periodic Technical Inspection of Passenger Cars". Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 21 (24): 8325. doi:10.3390/s21248325. ISSN 1424-8220. PMC 8707661. PMID 34960418.
- ^ "AECC - Light-duty vehicles - Legislative updates". AECC. Retrieved 12 March 2026.
- ^ Krasa, H.; Kupper, M.; Schriefl, M. A.; Bergmann, A. (3 April 2023). "Toward a simplified calibration method for 23 nm automotive particle counters using atomized inorganic salt particles". Aerosol Science and Technology. 57 (4): 329–341. doi:10.1080/02786826.2023.2174410.
- ^ Kittelson, David; Khalek, Imad; McDonald, Joseph; Stevens, Jeffrey; Giannelli, Robert (2022). "Particle emissions from mobile sources: Discussion of ultrafine particle emissions and definition". Journal of Aerosol Science. 159: 1–31. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105881. ISSN 0021-8502. PMC 9074695. PMID 35530659.
- ^ Ntziachristos, Leonidas; Polidori, Andrea; Phuleria, Harish; Geller, Michael D.; Sioutas, Constantinos (16 May 2007). "Application of a Diffusion Charger for the Measurement of Particle Surface Concentration in Different Environments". Aerosol Science and Technology. doi:10.1080/02786820701272020#d1e284.
- ^ Lepistö, Teemu; Kuuluvainen, Heino; Juuti, Paxton; Järvinen, Anssi; Arffman, Anssi; Rönkkö, Topi (2020-04-24). "Measurement of the human respiratory tract deposited surface area of particles with an electrical low pressure impactor". Aerosol Science and Technology. 54 (8): 958–971. doi:10.1080/02786826.2020.1745141. ISSN 0278-6826. Archived from the original on 2022-03-17.
- ^ Ali, A; Shi, G; Guo, Y (27 February 2026). "Separation of Flexible Rod-like Particle Mixtures by Intersecting Air Flow". Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 19 (5). doi:10.3390/ma19050908. PMID 41828177.
- ^ Ji, Xuzheng; Huang, Jianying; Teng, Lin; Li, Shuhui; Li, Xiao; Cai, Weilong; Chen, Zhong; Lai, Yuekun (June 2023). "Advances in particulate matter filtration: Materials, performance, and application". Green Energy & Environment. 8 (3): 673–697. doi:10.1016/j.gee.2022.03.012.
External links
- NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (5th edition) (c.f. chapters on bioaerosol indoor air sampling and elemental carbon
- MSHA Respirable Dust Sampling - On YouTube