Flock Safety

Flock Group Inc.
Company typePrivate
IndustryTechnology
Surveillance
Founded2017 (2017)
FoundersGarrett Langley
Matt Feury
Paige Todd
HeadquartersAtlanta, Georgia[1],
U.S.
Key people
Garrett Langley (CEO)
ProductsAutomated license plate readers
CCTV cameras
Gunfire detection systems
Software
Number of employees
1,500 (2025)[2]
Websiteflocksafety.com

Flock Group Inc., doing business as Flock Safety,[3] is an American manufacturer and operator of security hardware and software, particularly automated license plate recognition (ALPR), video surveillance, and gunfire locator systems, and supporting software to integrate the data gathered by these technologies. Founded in 2017, Flock operates such systems under contract with law enforcement agencies, neighborhood associations, and private property owners. As of 2025, Flock claims to operate in over 5,000 communities across 49 U.S. states, and perform over 20 billion scans of vehicles in the U.S. every month.[4][5][6] Flock Safety's network of cameras, utilizing image recognition and machine learning, can share data with police departments and can be integrated into predictive policing platforms like Palantir.[7]

Flock differs from its competitors in that it markets their services not just to law enforcement, but also to homeowner associations and similar community organizations as tools for crime prevention. They claim that their systems aid criminal investigations; however, they are widely described by critics as an example of mass surveillance, and their efficacy and effects on privacy and other civil liberties are the subject of extensive public scrutiny, debate, and litigation.[8]

Corporate history

Flock was founded in 2017.[3][9][10] It was co-founded by three Georgia Tech alumni: Garrett Langley (CEO), Paige Todd (CHRO), and Matt Feury (CTO).[11][12] It began as a side project in which the three co-founders built their first video surveillance cameras by hand around Langley's dining room table.[11] When a DeKalb County detective told Langley that his camera product had helped with solving a home break-in, Langley called the two other co-founders and told them to quit their jobs.[11]

By 2024, Flock's fixed cameras had been installed in over 4,000 cities across 42 states.[13][14][15] By April of that year, Flock employed over 900 people.[12]

In June 2024, a judge in the Norfolk, Virginia, Circuit Court ruled that collecting location data from the city's 172 Flock ALPRs constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, and cannot be used as evidence in a criminal case when collected without a warrant. The ruling likened ALPR location databases to tracking devices, whose use by police was previously found unconstitutional without a warrant in United States v. Jones.[16] Following this ruling, the company began to receive additional push back from communities concerned about the legality of their operation.[17][18][19]

That October, Flock acquired Aerodome, a manufacturer of drones for law enforcement, and announced plans to introduce its own line of drones.[20]

As of 2025, Flock is used by over 6,000 municipalities in the United States. The raised a total $950 million in venture funding, with a $7.5 billion valuation.[21][22] Some cities have stopped working with Flock over the use of its data in immigration enforcement and for community privacy concerns.[23]

In October 2025, Flock Safety announced a partnership with Amazon's Ring security products, where residents with ring cameras have the option to share video data to public safety agencies in legal investigations.[24][25] The plan came under scrutiny after Amazon ran an ad during Super Bowl LX that depicted the "Search Party" function for finding missing or lost pets across enhanced with AI surveillance. A joint decision was made to cancel the planned integration.[26] "Integration never launched, so no Ring customer videos were ever sent to Flock Safety."[27]

Products

Automatic license plate readers

According to The Center for Human Rights and Privacy, Flock's products, the Falcon and Sparrow, are cameras which monitor traffic and photograph the rear of all passing vehicles. Their software uses computer vision to read the vehicles' license plates and identify other distinguishing visual characteristics, sending that information to a central server via cellular network.[28] Flock's servers then log these identifying data, with the time and location of the scan, in a searchable database, and compare all results with the National Crime Information Center, as well as state and local police watchlists of cars that are reported stolen or otherwise of interest to the police, instantly alerting nearby officers upon a match.[29][30]

ALPRs like Flock's differ from traffic enforcement cameras in that they are for surveillance and criminal investigations, and do not perform any enforcement of traffic laws.[31][32][33]

Flock claims that its system's ability to identify vehicles' visual features, which it calls "vehicle fingerprint technology", is unique among ALPR systems; they state that the system can identify vehicles' make, model, and color, as well as other distinguishing attributes such as mismatching colors, bumper stickers, dents, and temporary license plates, allowing investigators to search for recorded vehicles based on these characteristics.[15][34][35] Flock claims that its ALPRs can capture images of vehicles traveling at up to 100 miles per hour (160 km/h), at distances of up to 75 feet (23 m), regardless of lighting.[31]

Most Flock devices are powered by solar panels and rechargeable batteries,[7] allowing them to operate in locations without access to utility power.[36] Many are mounted on manufacturer-supplied poles, while others are affixed to existing lampposts or telephone poles.[36][37] Flock's primary competitor in the ALPR market is Motorola Solutions.[29][38]

Integration with other camera systems

Flock offers software which integrates its ALPR and vehicle identification software into existing video camera systems, including Axon dashcams widely used in police vehicles.[39][40]

Person lookup tool

In May 2025, 404 Media reported that Flock was developing a new product called Nova that the company referred as a "public safety data platform," which would supplement ALPR data with information from data breaches, public records, and commercially available data in order to track specific individuals without a warrant, and which as of May 2025 was already in use by law enforcement in an Early Access program.[41] The Electronic Frontier Foundation described Flock Nova as a "dystopian panopticon".[42] After the 404 Media reporting, the company decided not to include information from data breaches in Nova.[43] However, an independent security researcher reported in December 2025 that an analysis of Flock's code still contained references to the dark web.[44]

Gunshot detector

Launched in 2021, the Flock Raven is an audio gunfire locator, similar in function to ShotSpotter.[45] The Raven records audio in 5-second increments, using artificial intelligence to analyze the sound clips for audible gunfire; when a gunshot is detected, the device estimates its location and alerts police.[46] Like the ALPRs, they can be mounted on manufacturer-supplied poles and powered by solar panels.[47]

In October 2025, Flock announced that their Raven devices would begin listening for "human distress", with advertisements showing police being alerted when the device picks up on screaming.[48]

Business model

Flock owns and operates all of its devices,[49] leasing them to various categories of customers.[50][51][52] Marketing materials center on efforts to reduce crime, and the company uses bird-themed product names, assertedly to reinforce the theme of watchfulness.[7] While companies in this space tend to primarily market their products to law enforcement agencies, Flock also markets its products to community organizations and private entities,[7] with some customers sharing data from their systems with police agencies.[53][54]

Flock has developed relationships with several mayors.[55][56] After Denver city council voted to end the city's relationship with the company, the mayor negotiated a free six month extension of the contract for which no approval was required.[55]

Efficacy

Some law enforcement agencies have said that the technology is "[h]elpful at generating investigative leads and solving crimes that may have otherwise gone unsolved", with some additionally claiming a deterrent effect.[31]

In 2024, Cyrus Farivar, writing for Forbes, questioned a statistic crediting Flock Safety's technology with an 80% reduction in residential burglaries in San Marino, California in early 2021 compared to the same period in 2020, with Farivar's piece asserting that burglaries actually slightly increased, and that serious crimes remained nearly unchanged.[57] Farivar also questioned similar claims from Flock regarding Fort Worth, Dayton, and Lexington.[57]

A 2021 study of Flock's Falcon camera by "surveillance research firm IPVM ... found a 10% error rate in the camera output". Flock then halted sales to IPVM and disputed the accuracy of IPVM's findings.[58] Inaccuracies in Flock's cameras have resulted in wrongful arrests in several cities.[58]

Privacy concerns and potential misuse

Privacy concerns have been raised with respect to ALPRs generally, including Flock's systems.[59][60][61][8] Additionally, Flock's surveillance model has spurred debate.[62][63][64][65] Flock's surveillance technology is often criticized for its broadening of public surveillance, and lead to a chilling effect on civil liberties, as described by privacy experts and organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The EFF argues that ALPRs create more problems than they solve.[66]

In March 2022, the American Civil Liberties Union released a report criticizing Flock Safety's business model and products.[67] In 2023, the ACLU acknowledged some uses of ALPRs could be acceptable, but emphasized the need for careful controls:[29]

There's no reason the technology should be used to create comprehensive records of everybody's comings and goings — and that is precisely what ALPR databases like Flock's are doing. In our country, the government should not be tracking us unless it has individualized suspicion that we're engaged in wrongdoing.

In October 2024, the Institute for Justice filed a federal lawsuit against the Norfolk Police Department on behalf of two local residents, asserting that the department's use of Flock ALPRs constitutes illegal surveillance in violation of the Fourth Amendment.[18][68][69] In California, state law prohibits sharing license plate reader data with federal agencies, but in 2025 it was reported that several state and municipal law enforcement agencies have nonetheless done so.[70]

In 2025, it was reported that Flock data had been queried for use in immigration enforcement.[71] A pilot program of investigation with Customs and Border Protection and Homeland Security Investigations was initiated to help combat human trafficking and fentanyl distribution. Flock halted the program in August because of "confusion and concerns" about the purpose of the investigations.[72] Local governments shared the data by either blindly approving the inquiries or unknowingly signing onto the national sharing option.[73]

References

  1. ^ "ACG Atlanta Names Flock Safety One of Georgia's Top 40 Fastest-growing Companies". www.flocksafety.com. June 28, 2023. Archived from the original on February 26, 2026. Retrieved February 26, 2026. Flock Safety is proud to announce we have been named one of Georgia's top 40 fastest-growing companies by the Atlanta Chapter of the Association for Corporate Growth® (ACG)...Companies on the list are for profit and headquartered in Georgia.
  2. ^ Chapman, Lizette (August 7, 2025). "Controversial Surveillance Startup Flock Adds AI to Police Tech". Bloomberg News.
  3. ^ a b Gupta, Arun; George, Gerard; Fewer, Thomas (January 9, 2024). "Venture Meets Mission: Aligning People, Purpose, and Profit to Innovate and Transform Society". Stanford University Press. pp. 132–33 – via Google Books.
  4. ^ "News conference: Federal lawsuit filed against use of Flock cameras in Norfolk". WAVY-TV (Video). Archived from the original on January 26, 2025. Retrieved October 23, 2024 – via Facebook.
  5. ^ "Flock Safety Expands Into Drones for Law Enforcement with Acquisition of Aerodome". Flock Safety. October 16, 2024. Retrieved October 23, 2024 – via GlobeNewswire.
  6. ^ "National LPR Network". Flock Safety. Retrieved July 12, 2025.
  7. ^ a b c d Rettberg, Jill Walker (September 11, 2023). Machine Vision: How Algorithms are Changing the Way We See the World. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 45–46 – via Google Books.
  8. ^ a b "'Possibility of misuse a real one': ACLU shares privacy concerns for police Flock Safety cameras". WUWM 89.7 FM - Milwaukee's NPR. September 8, 2023. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
  9. ^ Polcyn, Bryan (August 2, 2023). "Wisconsin AI-powered Flock cameras are tracking where you drive". FOX6 News Milwaukee. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  10. ^ Flock Safety. "Media Kit: Our Founding Story". Flock Safety. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
  11. ^ a b c Edmonson, Crystal (August 22, 2023). "Flock Safety cameras help police amid worker shortage, CEO Garrett Langley says (Podcast)". Atlanta Business Chronicle. Archived from the original on May 2, 2024. Retrieved July 9, 2024. Despite the article title, the linked source is an actual article and not a mere transcript of a podcast.
  12. ^ a b Southerland, Randy (April 26, 2024). "Flock Safety employment reaches 900; develops new products". Atlanta Business Chronicle.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  13. ^ "License Plate Surveillance Startup Broke The Law While Trying To Reduce Crime". Jalopnik. February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
  14. ^ Cheng, Isabella (February 16, 2022). "Flock Raises Another $150 Million, Valuation Now At $3.5 Billion". IPVM. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
  15. ^ a b "Investing in Flock Safety". Andreessen Horowitz. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
  16. ^ "Norfolk judge rejects police Flock camera evidence without warrant". The Virginian-Pilot. June 15, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  17. ^ Service, Tribune News (September 27, 2024). "Department of Public Safety Puts Flock Safety on Notice". Industry Insider Texas.
  18. ^ a b Daniel, Lars. "Privacy Violated, Warrantless Surveillance Alleges Flock Safety Camera Lawsuit". Forbes. Archived from the original on October 22, 2024. Retrieved October 23, 2024.
  19. ^ Mir, Rory (June 6, 2025). "Victory! Austin Organizers Cancel City's Flock ALPR Contract". Electronic Frontier Foundation.
  20. ^ "Flock Safety acquires Aerodome to expand into drone-based law enforcement solutions". Police1. October 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 3, 2024. Retrieved October 23, 2024.
  21. ^ Bort, Julie (March 13, 2025). "Y Combinator's police surveillance darling Flock Safety raises $275M at $7.5B valuation". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 24, 2026.
  22. ^ Brewster, Thomas (September 3, 2025). "AI Startup Flock Thinks It Can Eliminate All Crime In America". Forbes.
  23. ^ Duffy, Clare (December 19, 2025). "The tech firm that helped police find the Brown shooting suspect has sparked privacy concerns. Its CEO responds". CNN. Retrieved February 22, 2025.
  24. ^ "Ring's latest partnership allows police to request camera footage through Flock". Engadget. October 17, 2025. Archived from the original on October 21, 2025. Retrieved November 2, 2025.
  25. ^ "Flock Safety and Ring Partner to Help Neighborhoods Work Together for Safer Communities". www.flocksafety.com. October 31, 2025.
  26. ^ Palmer, Annie (February 13, 2026). "Amazon's Ring cancels Flock partnership amid Super Bowl ad backlash". CNBC.
  27. ^ Walker, Mark (February 14, 2026). "Ring Ends Deal to Link Neighborhood Cameras After Super Bowl Ad Backlash". The New York Times.
  28. ^ Katz-Lecabe, Mike (April 1, 2022). "Dissection of Flock Safety Camera". The Center for Human Rights and Privacy. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024.
  29. ^ a b c Marlow, Chad; Stanley, Jay (February 13, 2023). "How to Pump the Brakes on Your Police Department's Use of Flock's Mass Surveillance License Plate Readers". American Civil Liberties Union. Archived from the original on May 14, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  30. ^ Bunch, Edward III (July 26, 2023). "A new kind of surveillance camera is coming to some Florida neighborhoods. What we know". Pensacola News Journal. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  31. ^ a b c "Got Your Number: City law enforcement begins testing license plate cameras". The Columbus Republic. January 23, 2022. pp. A1. Archived from the original on April 7, 2025. Retrieved March 9, 2025 – via newspapers.com. "Continued on A4". Archived from the original on April 7, 2025. Retrieved March 9, 2025.
  32. ^ "Innovative license plate reader technology now in use on CU Boulder campus". CU Boulder Today. July 17, 2023. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024.
  33. ^ "License Plate Readers". City of Lexington, Kentucky. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024.
  34. ^ "Fort Worth, Texas, Deploys Solar-Powered License Plate Cameras". GovTech. August 23, 2021. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
  35. ^ "West Covina Police Install Network Of Flock Safety License Plate Reading Cameras In Strategic Locations - CBS Los Angeles". www.cbsnews.com. August 20, 2021. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
  36. ^ a b McNamara, Kevin (March 25, 2022). "Ask 10: What are the solar-powered cameras attached to power poles?". KTVL. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  37. ^ O'Horo, Ryan (November 21, 2023). "Surveillance as a Service Part 1: Flock Safety's Transparency Problem". Medium. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  38. ^ Brewster, Thomas (February 27, 2024). "This $4 Billion Car Surveillance Startup Says It Cuts Crime. But It Likely Broke The Law". Forbes. Retrieved February 27, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  39. ^ Axon. "Axon Partners with Flock Safety to Enhance Security for Cities and Neighborhoods". www.prnewswire.com. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  40. ^ "MyAxon". MyAxon. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  41. ^ Cox, Joseph (May 14, 2025). "License Plate Reader Company Flock Is Building a Massive People Lookup Tool, Leak Shows". 404 Media. Archived from the original on May 14, 2025. Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  42. ^ Rueter, Thad (May 27, 2025). "Flock's Newest Police Tool Sparks Data Controversy". GovTech.
  43. ^ Rueter, Thad (May 30, 2025). "Flock Safety Pushes Back on Data Breach Product Criticism". GovTech.
  44. ^ Mitchell, Joshua (December 2025). "License Plate Reader Company Flock Said It Does Not Use Dark Web Data. My Analysis of Their Code Tells a Different Story". NexaNet. Retrieved March 19, 2026.
  45. ^ "Flock Expands Into Gunshot And Audio Analytics (Raven)". IPVM. October 20, 2021. Archived from the original on March 22, 2023.
  46. ^ Gagliano, Katie (February 15, 2024). "Lafayette Police testing gunshot detection system in high-crime neighborhoods". The Advocate.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  47. ^ Willard, Keenan (December 8, 2023). "Fort Worth to add automatic gunshot audio detectors to some neighborhoods". NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024.
  48. ^ Guariglia, Matthew (October 2, 2025). "Flock's Gunshot Detection Microphones Will Start Listening for Human Voices". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on October 10, 2025. Retrieved October 10, 2025.
  49. ^ "Does My Neighborhood Need A Flock Safety License Plate Reader?". Flock Safety. April 19, 2019.
  50. ^ Polcyn, Bryan (August 2, 2023). "Wisconsin AI-powered Flock cameras are tracking where you drive". FOX6 News Milwaukee. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  51. ^ "Licking Heights schools install flock cameras to detect criminals in the area". WBNS-TV (Video). November 16, 2023. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024 – via YouTube.
  52. ^ Brewster, Thomas (May 6, 2024). "America's Biggest Mall Owner Is Sharing AI Surveillance Feeds Directly With Cops". Forbes.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  53. ^ "Suburbs of Surveillance". Bloomberg.com. August 4, 2021. Archived from the original on September 14, 2022. Retrieved December 10, 2023.
  54. ^ Brewster, Thomas. "FedEx's Secretive Police Force Is Helping Cops Build An AI Car Surveillance Network". Forbes.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  55. ^ a b Zialcita, Paolo; DeMare, Kiara (October 22, 2025). "Denver extends Flock surveillance cameras despite pushback from city council". Denverite.
  56. ^ MacColl, Margaux; Rollet, Charles (January 8, 2025). "Flock Safety quietly hired a sitting California mayor. Now he's suing Flock". TechCrunch. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  57. ^ a b Farivar, Cyrus. "Flock Installed AI Cameras In This Small City And Claimed Crime Went Down. It Went Up". Forbes. Archived from the original on February 29, 2024. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  58. ^ a b "Saranac Lake halts controversial police cam installation". Adirondack Daily Enterprise. Archived from the original on February 28, 2026.
  59. ^ Joh, Elizabeth (September 24, 2019). "The Rise of Networked Vigilante Surveillance". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
  60. ^ Sheridan, Stacey (April 5, 2022). "Oak Park to get eight license plate reading cameras". Oak Park. Archived from the original on April 6, 2022. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
  61. ^ Harwell, Drew (October 21, 2021). "License plate scanners were supposed to bring peace of mind. Instead they tore the neighborhood apart". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 4, 2024. Retrieved March 10, 2025.
  62. ^ Harwell, Drew (October 23, 2021). "License plate scanners were supposed to bring peace of mind. Instead they tore the neighborhood apart". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 18, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  63. ^ "Council Debating License Plate Readers". Good Times. December 6, 2023. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  64. ^ Writer, Billy Jarrell Staff (December 8, 2023). "Citizens express dissent at Flock Safety security system informational meeting". Lincoln News Now!. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
  65. ^ Bradley, Kian (November 9, 2023). "Mercer Island Debates Surveillance Cameras - The Urbanist". www.theurbanist.org. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
  66. ^ Guariglia, Jason Kelley and Matthew (September 14, 2020). "Things to Know Before Your Neighborhood Installs an Automated License Plate Reader". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on May 9, 2022. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
  67. ^ Stanley, Jay (March 3, 2022). "Fast-Growing Company Flock is Building a New AI-Driven Mass-Surveillance System". American Civil Liberties Union. Archived from the original on April 8, 2022. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
  68. ^ Littlehales, Alex (October 22, 2024). "Federal lawsuit filed in Norfolk over use of traffic surveillance cameras". WVEC-TV.
  69. ^ Brodkin, Jon (October 22, 2024). "Lawsuit: City cameras make it impossible to drive anywhere without being tracked". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on October 22, 2024. Retrieved October 23, 2024.
  70. ^ Chien, Tomoki (July 14, 2025). "SF, Oakland cops illegally funneled license plate data to feds". The San Francisco Standard. Archived from the original on July 14, 2025. Retrieved July 14, 2025.
  71. ^ Koebler, Jason; Cox, Joseph (May 27, 2025). "ICE Taps into Nationwide AI-Enabled Camera Network, Data Shows". 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 2, 2025. Retrieved June 2, 2025.
  72. ^ O'Connor, John (August 25, 2025). "License plate camera company halts cooperation with federal agencies among investigation concerns". Yahoo News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on August 25, 2025. Retrieved August 26, 2025.
  73. ^ Wardwell, Faith (November 30, 2025). "Liberal towns backtrack on license plate trackers amid concerns about privacy — and Trump". Politico. Retrieved February 22, 2025.
  • Media related to Flock Safety at Wikimedia Commons
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.