Closed point
In mathematics, a closed point of a topological space is a point whose singleton is closed. In many areas of geometry and topology, all spaces under consideration are T1 spaces that only have closed points. The distinction between closed and non-closed points is most often made in algebraic geometry, where schemes can have non-closed points.
Definition and intuition
If is a topological space, a point is called closed if the singleton is closed.[1] The closed points of a topological space are the most specific points under the specialization preorder.[2][3] This means that a point is non-closed if it specializes to at least one other point.
Closed points can be thought of as having specific positions.[4] If is non-closed, it is generic in the set of points to which it specializes, which includes at least one point in addition to . can then be pictured as a nonspecific point[4] that is somewhere within but has no particular position within it,[5] or as a diffuse large point[6] that contains all other points of .[7] Both of these visualizations portray the fact that is "almost everywhere" in at the same time, and it is near each other point of .[5]
Examples
- A topological space is T1 if and only if all of its points are closed.[8] Many types of spaces are T1,[8] such as manifolds (including non-Hausdorff manifolds[9]) and spaces with the cofinite topology.
- When an algebraic variety is considered as a scheme, every Zariski-closed subvariety of it is endowed with an additional point, which is generic in that subvariety. The original points of the variety are the closed points of the resulting scheme.[10]
- In the spectrum of a commutative ring, the points are the prime ideals of the ring, and the closed points are the maximal ideals.[1]
- In particular, the points of the spectrum of a principal ideal domain are the ideals generated by prime elements (defined up to a unit) and the zero ideal. The points that correspond to prime elements are closed, and the point that corresponds to zero is generic.[11]
- The Sierpiński space has two points. One of them is closed, and the other is non-closed since it specializes to the first point.[12]
- If two points are topologically indistinguishable, they specialize to each other and hence neither of them is closed.
Properties
In any scheme that is locally of finite type over a field, the set of closed points is dense.[13] In particular, this is true for schemes that correspond to algebraic varieties. This is not always the case, even for an affine scheme. For example, the spectrum of a discrete valuation ring is (topologically) the aforementioned Sierpiński space.[14] Nonempty quasi-compact schemes (and in particular affine schemes) must have at least one closed point.[15] However, there are schemes without any closed points at all,[16] including irreducible schemes.[15]
Let be affine scheme (or equivalently, a spectral space). is normal if and only if its closed points can be separated by neighborhoods.[17] If the space of closed points of is connected, is connected too, and the converse holds if is normal.[18] If is normal, the space of closed points of is compact (and Hausdorff).[19] A normal affine scheme is simply the spectrum of a commutative Gelfand ring,[20] so these are in fact properties of the maximal spectra of such rings.
Locally closed point
A locally closed point, or a Goldman point, is a point such that the singleton is locally closed. This is equivalent to the condition that is isolated in , and it is weaker than the condition of being closed.[21]
Unlike the case of closed points, the locally closed points are dense in every affine scheme.[22]
References
- ^ a b Vakil 2025, p. 121
- ^ Hartshorne 1977, pp. 93–94
- ^ Johnstone 1986, p. 66
- ^ a b Vakil 2025, p. 123
- ^ a b Vakil 2025, p. 114
- ^ Vakil 2025, p. 106
- ^ Vakil 2025, p. 122
- ^ a b Dickmann, Schwartz & Tressl 2019, p. 4
- ^ Brandsma, Henno (10 March 2019). "Locally Euclidean space implies T1 space". Stack Exchange.
- ^ Hartshorne 1977, pp. 77–80
- ^ Görtz & Wedhorn 2020, pp. 46–47
- ^ Dickmann, Schwartz & Tressl 2019, pp. 8–9
- ^ Vakil 2025, p. 164
- ^ Hartshorne 1977, p. 74
- ^ a b Görtz & Wedhorn 2020, pp. 78, 92
- ^ Vakil 2025, pp. 436–437
- ^ Dickmann, Schwartz & Tressl 2019, p. 281
- ^ Dickmann, Schwartz & Tressl 2019, p. 200
- ^ Dickmann, Schwartz & Tressl 2019, p. 283
- ^ Dickmann, Schwartz & Tressl 2019, p. 246
- ^ Dickmann, Schwartz & Tressl 2019, p. 135
- ^ Dickmann, Schwartz & Tressl 2019, pp. 132, 139
Sources
- Vakil, Ravi (21 October 2025). The Rising Sea: Foundations of Algebraic Geometry (PDF). Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-26867-5.
- Hartshorne, Robin (19 December 1977). Algebraic Geometry. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-1-4419-2807-8.
- Johnstone, Peter T. (29 August 1986). Stone Spaces. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-33779-3.
- Görtz, Ulrich; Wedhorn, Torsten (27 July 2020). Algebraic Geometry I: Schemes. Springer Studium Mathematik – Master (2 ed.). Springer Spektrum. ISBN 978-3-658-30733-2.
- Dickmann, Max; Schwartz, Niels; Tressl, Marcus (8 March 2019). Spectral Spaces. New Mathematical Monographs. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-14672-3.