Tang of Shang
| Tang 湯 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Depiction of King Tang by Ma Lin | |||||||||
| King of the Shang dynasty | |||||||||
| Reign | c. 1600 BC - c. 1587 BC[1] | ||||||||
| Predecessor | Position established Shi Gui of Predynastic Shang | ||||||||
| Successor | |||||||||
| Leader of the Predynastic Shang | |||||||||
| Reign | ? - c. 1600 BC | ||||||||
| Predecessor | Shi Gui[2] | ||||||||
| Successor | Position abolished | ||||||||
| Born | c. 1670 B.C.[1] Predynastic Shang | ||||||||
| Died | c. 1587 B.C.[1] Bo (亳, modern-day Shangqiu, Henan) | ||||||||
| Spouse | Bi Jia (妣甲)[3] Bi Bing (妣丙)[4] | ||||||||
| Issue | Da Ding, Bu Bing | ||||||||
| |||||||||
| Cheng Tang | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Chinese | 成湯 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Simplified Chinese | 成汤 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Temple name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chinese | 太乙 大乙 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Birth name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Traditional Chinese | 子履 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Simplified Chinese | 子履 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Part of a series on |
| Religion of the Shang dynasty |
|---|
Tang of Shang,[a] (c. 1670 B.C. to c. 1587 B.C.,[1] born Zi Lü[b][5]), recorded on oracle bones as Tai Yi[5] or Da Yi, was the first king of the Shang dynasty. Tang is traditionally considered a virtuous ruler, as signified by his posthumous epithet Cheng Tang.[c] According to legend,[6] as the last leader of the Predynastic Shang he overthrew Jie, the last king of the Xia dynasty. As his reign precedes the Late Shang era, records of his life and reign are limited to oracle bone inscriptions and posthumous works.
Names
Cheng Tang (成湯) is a posthumous title given to Tang after his death.[7] Tang (湯) is what is typically used by Zhou dynasty writers onwards.
In oracle bone inscriptions, Tang is referred to by either Da Yi (大乙) or Tai Yi (太乙),[8] either of which can be seen in transcriptions by scholars depending on the interpretation of the oracle bone script character. The character yi in these names implies the day in which sacrifices were to be made to him by Shang dynasty religious practitioners, in this case the second of ten.[9]
Reign
During Predynastic Shang
Tang succeeded Shi Gui as ruler of Predynastic Shang, one of the many kingdoms under the suzerainty of the Xia dynasty, for 17 years. During Jie's reign, Shang grew in power, initially at the expense of Xia's other vassals. He was able to win many supporters from as many as 40 smaller kingdoms.[10] Tang recognized that Jie mistreated his people and used this to convince others. According to legend, in one speech, Tang said that creating chaos was not something he wanted, but given the terror of Jie, he had to follow the Mandate of Heaven and use this opportunity to overthrow Xia.[10] As an advantage he pointed out that even Jie's own military generals would not obey his orders.[10]
In the 15th year of Jie's reign, Tang began moving Lü to the capital Bo. About two years later Shang sent his minister Yi Yin as an envoy to Jie. Yi remained in the Xia capital for about three years, before returning to Shang.[11]
The Shang's power continued to grow. In the 26th year of Jie's reign, Shang conquered Wen. Two years later, Shang was attacked by Kunwu, and several years of war between Shang and Kunwu followed.[12] Despite this setback, Shang continued to expand on a number of fronts, gathering vassal troops in Jingpo. The Shang army and allied forces conquered Mixu (密須, today's Xinmi in Henan), Wei, and attacked Gu, which too was conquered the following year.[12] About this time Zhong Gu, chief historian of Jie, would flee from the Xia to the Shang.[12]
Battle of Mingtiao
The Shang army fought against Jie's Xia forces at Mingtiao (鳴條) in a heavy thunderstorm and defeated them.
Jie himself escaped and fled to Sanzong. The Shang forces under their general Wuzi pursued Jie to Cheng, captured him at Jiaomen, and deposed him, bringing the Xia dynasty to an end. Eventually, Jie was exiled in Nanchao.[12] Jie would eventually die of illness[10] and Tang succeeded him as paramount King, inaugurating the Shang dynasty.
In the Book of Documents
The Book of Documents (尚書) contains a speech said to have been spoken by Tang after the Battle of Mingtiao, though its authenticity is disputed.[13]
The king said, 'Come, ye multitudes of the people, listen all to my words. It is not I, the little child, who dare to undertake a rebellious enterprise; but for the many crimes of the sovereign of Xia, Heaven has given the charge to destroy him. Now, ye multitudes, you are saying, "Our prince does not compassionate us, but (is calling us) away from our husbandry to attack and punish Xia." I have indeed heard (these) words of you all; (but) the sovereign of Xia is guilty, and as I fear God, I dare not but punish him. Now you are saying, "What are the crimes of Xia to us?" The king of Xia in every way exhausts the strength of his people, and exercises oppression in the cities of Xia. His multitudes are become entirely indifferent (to his service), and feel no bond of union'(to him). They are saying, "When wilt thou, O sun, expire? We will all perish with thee." Such is the course of (the sovereign) of Xia, and now I must go (and punish him).
Assist, I pray you, me, the One man, to carry out the punishment appointed by Heaven. I will greatly reward you. On no account disbelieve me - I will not eat my words. If you do not obey the words which I have thus spoken to you, I will put your children to death with you - you shall find no forgiveness.
- James Legge translation, 1865
Progenitor of the Shang dynasty
Tang's reign was regarded as a good time by the Chinese.[5] He lowered taxes and the conscription rate of soldiers. His influence spread to the Yellow River, and many outlying tribes, such as Di and Qiang, became vassal states. He also established Anyang as the new capital of China.[11]
According to the Bamboo Annals, Tang built a palace called Xia She (夏社) to memorialize the Xia dynasty. In the first five years of his reign, there was a constant drought.[14][15] Tang ordered golden coins to be made and distributed to poor families who had been forced to sell their children because of the drought. It was intended for them to use this money to buy their children back. The Xinshu (新書) notes that Tang had stockpiled around 10 years of resources during his reign over Predynastic Shang, which allowed his people to overcome the drought.[16]
In the 9th year of his reign, Tang moved the Nine Tripod Cauldrons, made by Yu the Great, to the Shang Palace.[11]
In Records of the Grand Historian, Tang is recorded as going on punitive expeditions to ensure that sacrificial rituals as part of the Shang state religion are upheld. The penalty for not upholding proper sacrifice, as shown in his dialogue with the chief of the State of Ge, was death; forgiveness was not on the table.[2]
Personal life
Tang was a descendent of Xie, making him a descendent of Emperor Ku and the legendary Yellow Emperor.[2] Tang had two consorts who were recorded in oracle bones, their temple names being Bi Jia (妣甲) and Bi Bing (妣丙).[3][4]
The Great Learning chapter of the Book of Rites notes that Tang's bathtub had an engraving stating: "If you can one day renovate yourself, do so from day to day. Yea, let there be daily renovation." (茍日新，日日新，又日新).[17]
Tang maintained a close relationship with his minister Yi Yin (伊尹), the title yin "尹" itself meaning "minister" or "official." Their connection was made through Yi Yin's cooking skills; whilst cooking meals for Tang, Yi Yin would advise him on balancing the five flavours (sweet, sour, bitter, pungent, and salty) and regulation of temperature. This led to Yi Yin eventually giving his informed political opinions, allowing him to achieve this ministerial position.[2][18][19]
Tang is said to have composed several works, though they are considered lost;
- Dahuole 大濩樂, composed during a period of mourning.[11]
- Xiashe 夏社、Yizhi 疑至、and Chenhu 臣扈, poems composed after not being able to move the Xia shrine.[13]
In oracle bone inscriptions
Tang is recorded as Da Yi (大乙) in oracle bone inscriptions, the records of him totalling around 350.[8] Sacrifices made towards Tang were particularly grandiose, such as the use of a xiang sacrifice involving a large-scale banquet in his honour,[20] and the use of drums to announce a sacrifice to him:
貞大乙祖丁暨饗[21]
Test: Should we perform a banquet in the honour of Da Yi and Zu Ding together?
庚子貞其告鼓于大乙六牛惟龜祝[22]
On the gengzi [庚子] day, may we announce with drums to Da Yi with six oxen? And is it with a turtle with which we shall pray?
Additionally, Tang, alongside his consorts, would occasionally receive sacrifices, such as in this example with Bi Bing:
其侑妣丙暨大乙𫹉王受祐[23]
May we perform a "you" [侑] sacrifice for Bi Bing and Da Yi? With a you [𫹉] sacrifice, would the ruler receive protection?
Animal sacrifices would be of similarly high quantity, typically performed with you 侑 ("to urge [someone] to eat") sacrifices consisting of dining with a given ancestor.[24]
辛未卜來乙亥侑大乙五牢[25]
On the xinwei [辛未] day, scapulimancy was performed. Come the yihai [乙亥] day, should we make a you [侑] sacrifice to Da Yi of five oxen?
Posthumous accounts
Tang of Shang is mentioned in myriad texts across the Classical Chinese canon, usually alongside Emperor Yao, Emperor Shun, and King Wu of Zhou as examples of good rulers. This is often in contrast to Di Xin and Jie of Xia. In the Three Character Classic of the Song dynasty, Tang is paired with Yu the Great and King Wu of Zhou as the "Three Kings" (三王).[26]
In the Classic of Poetry
Tang is mentioned in each of the Classic of Poetry's Sacrificial Odes of Shang (商頌), usually in the context of asserting descent and expressing reverence. For example, in Xuanniao (玄鳥), Tang is documented as being ordered by an ancient thearch to govern the four directions:
古帝命武湯，正域彼四方。
Then an ancient thearch ordered General Tang; it was to govern the four directions.
Furthermore, in Na (那) and Liezu (烈祖), both mention Tang directly in closing, both with the following quote:
顧予烝嘗、湯孫之將。
Thus offered by I; a descendent of Tang!
Mao Heng (毛亨), the one to number each Ode, notes that Na in particular was for sacrificial rites towards Tang.[27]
In Confucianism
Tang is one of several rulers cited in Confucian texts as a model ruler. Particularly, Tang is noted as having internalised the ruling styles of Emperor Yao and Emperor Shun, but not necessarily being beholden to them, formulating a distinct style of government.[28]
Mencius pays particular attention to Tang's form of government in his discourse with King Hui of Wei, believing that his humane conquest of the Xia dynasty occurred because he utilised all 70 li of his kingdom. The humanness of Tang was exemplified by his commencement in Ge, punishing the rulers but consoling the people.[29] He also notes that Tang had employed his minister Yi Yin based on merit,[30] something Zi Xia took notice of in the Analects.[31]
In Legalism
In Hanfeizi
In his eponymous book, Han Fei uses Tang's reign resulting from Yi Yin's reform as an example of political reform by not following antiquity. By not being beholden to the traditions of those who came before him, acting in ways that would be laughed at by people in his day, Tang was able to overthrow a corrupt institution. However, the use of force is viewed as a dangerous precedent; as Tang (and King Wu of Zhou) was, by definition, a usurper who executed people and ministers, using him as a general model, in Han Fei's view, could lead to more attempts to take power.[32][33][34]
In The Book of Lord Shang
In the The Book of Lord Shang, Tang of Shang and Wu of Zhou are mentioned as having prohibited state reliance on five specific types of people: Scholars who discuss poetry and books; recluses; warriors; artisans; and merchants. This is used to form an argument that when these individuals are relied upon, neglect of agriculture and the weakening of military and authority are sure to follow.[35]
Myths
Tang has been portrayed in different ways in Chinese mythology and these portrayals have influenced popular depiction and paintings of him.[5]
He is often drawn as being "a nine-foot-tall, white-faced, whiskered man with a pointed head, six-jointed arms, and a body markedly larger on one side than on the other."[5]
A tradition about the I Ching was that most of it was written by Tang of Shang.[36]
Notes
References
- ^ a b c d Library of Congress. (2020). Shang Tang, Emperor of China, approximately 1670 B.C.-approximately 1587 B.C. 商汤, Emperor of China, approximately 1670 B.C.-approximately 1587 B.C. LC Linked Data Service. https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2016039306.html
- ^ a b c d Sima, Qian. "殷本紀". In Sturgeon, Donald (ed.). 史記 (in Literary Chinese). Chinese Text Project.
契卒，子昭明立。昭明卒，子相土立。相土卒，子昌若立。昌若卒，子曹圉立。曹圉卒，子冥立。冥卒，子振立。振卒，子微立。微卒，子报丁立。报丁卒，子报乙立。报乙卒，子报丙立。报丙卒，子主壬立。主壬卒，子主癸立。主癸卒，子天乙立，是为成汤。
- ^ a b 甲骨文合集 Heji 36199： X卜貞王X大乙爽妣甲無尤
- ^ a b 甲骨文合集 Heji 36194.1 & 36201：丙寅卜貞王賓大乙爽妣丙翌日無尤。& X申卜貞王X大乙爽妣丙X
- ^ a b c d e "Tang". Encyclopædia Britannica. 7 April 2008. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
- ^ Lai, Selena; Brown, Waka Takahashi (November 2006). "The Shang Dynasty, 1600 to 1050 BCE". SPICE. Stanford University. Retrieved 3 May 2023.
- ^ 班固. . (in Chinese) – via Wikisource.
湯死後稱成湯，以兩言為謚也。
- ^ a b "先秦甲骨金文簡牘詞彙庫". inscription.asdc.sinica.edu.tw. Archived from the original on 4 February 2026. Retrieved 12 February 2026.
- ^ Wu 吳, Junde 俊德 (2016). "商王日名來源析辨" [Analysis of the Origin of the Name of the King of Shang]. 儒學研究論叢 (in Chinese). 7. Taiwan: 83–109.
- ^ a b c d 王恆偉. (2005) (2006) 中國歷史講堂 #1 遠古至春秋. 中華書局. ISBN 962-8885-24-3. p 30.
- ^ a b c d Donald Sturgeon (ed.). "殷商成湯". 竹書紀年. Chinese Text Project.
- ^ a b c d 高明士, 国真梁. [2007] (2007). 中國通史. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司. ISBN 957-11-4312-X, 9789571143125. p. 46.
- ^ a b . (in Chinese) – via Wikisource.
- ^ Xigui, Qiu; Fowler, Vernon K. (1985). ""On the Burning of Human Victims and the Fashioning of Clay Dragons in Order to Seek Rain as Seen in the Shang Dynasty Oracle-Bone Inscriptions"". Early China. 9 (1): 290–306. doi:10.1017/S0362502800006441.
- ^ Zi, Mo. "卷一：七患". 墨子 (in Literary Chinese). Chinese Text Project. Retrieved 26 February 2026.
故《夏書》曰：「禹七年水。」《殷書》曰：「湯五年旱。」此其離凶餓甚矣。然而民不凍餓者，何也？其生財密，其用之節也。
- ^ Jia, Yi. "4: 无蓄". 新書 (in Literary Chinese). Chinese Text Project. Retrieved 26 February 2026.
湯有十年之積，故勝七歲之旱
- ^ Dai, Sheng; Zi, Si. "大學". In Sturgeon, Donald (ed.). 禮記 [Book of Rites] (in Literary Chinese and English). Chinese Text Project. Retrieved 28 February 2026.
湯之盤銘曰：「茍日新，日日新，又日新。」 / On the bathing tub of Tang, the following words were engraved: "If you can one day renovate yourself, do so from day to day. Yea, let there be daily renovation."
- ^ 負鼎 in Taiwan Ministry of Education. 1994. 重編國語辭典修定本
- ^ 戴, 逸; 龔, 書鐸. 史前‧夏‧商‧西周. 中國通史（學生彩圖版） (in Chinese). Hong Kong. pp. 62–63. ISBN 978-962-8792-80-1.
- ^ Wu 伍, Huanjian 煥堅 (2018). 金文中所見與酒禮相關之禮制及文字研究 (PDF). Hong Kong Baptist University. Retrieved 26 February 2026.
- ^ Heji 甲骨文合集 27147.1
- ^ Heji 甲骨文合集 32418.4
- ^ Heji 甲骨文合集 27501.2
- ^ Takashima, Kenichi (2009). "Jisi: A Reconstruction of the Ji Sacrifice and the Si Ritual in Ancient China". In Höllmann, Thomas O.; Wang-Riese, Xiaobing (eds.). Time and Ritual in Early China. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.
- ^ 小屯南地甲骨 4573.1
- ^ (in Chinese) – via Wikisource.
- ^ 毛詩序：《那》，祀成湯也。
- ^ . (in Chinese) – via Wikisource.
堯親九族協和萬國湯武桓桓征伐四克由是言之不膠者卓矣禮樂征伐自天子所出春秋之時齊晉實予不膠者卓矣！
- ^ 孟子. . (in Chinese) – via Wikisource.
- ^ 孟子. . (in Chinese) – via Wikisource.
- ^ 孔丘. . (in Chinese) – via Wikisource.
- ^ 韓非. (in Chinese) – via Wikisource.
- ^ Wang 王瀛, Yinfang 瀛昉 (2021). 一種可能的賢能政治制度系統新嘗試--以《黑子》、《荀子》和韓非子文本為基礎. Hong Kong: 香港中文大學. Retrieved 27 February 2026.
- ^ Li 李, Xianzhong 賢中 (2017). "中國法家的思維方法與文化影響". 2017년 새한철학회 추계학술대회 자료집. Retrieved 27 February 2026.
- ^ 商鞅. (in Chinese) – via Wikisource.
- ^ Bauer, Susan Wise (2007). The History of the Ancient World: From the Earliest Accounts to the Fall of Rome (1st ed.). New York: W. W. Norton. p. 300. ISBN 978-0-393-05974-8.